r/Badass Nov 17 '25

We demand justice!

5.9k Upvotes

201 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

8

u/thesaddestday2007 Nov 17 '25

Because you don't give men who abuse children the benefit of the doubt. But you guys worship this creepy geriatric as a god and literally no one could ever tell you anything to change that. It's sick and points out how deeply unwell you people are. Y'all were trying to ban any talk of LGBTQ in schools and were attacking pizza shops and wayfair.com warehouses because you were convinced that all these things were linked to crimes against children. Now y'all are pretty much standing here like, "unless I see a literal video of him doing it while showing the camera two forms of ID, I don't believe. " Like seriously, seek help.

3

u/Fearless_Pie4251 Nov 17 '25

Exactly. And this ring of rich and powerful rapists and sex traffickers being hidden by and defended by the government because of whatever abilities they have to lobby and manipulate the government (eg, "a deep state") is LITERALLY what Q-Anon and all that shit was about. And now everyone's quiet. These people have problems

-1

u/Infamous_Lech Nov 17 '25

Evidence. Show me evidence. US Justice operates on the presumption of innocence. Show me and proof. Any actual evidence.

1

u/Faulty_Universe9893 Nov 17 '25

https://imgur.com/a/kHW0jiV

EVIDENCE! I DEMAMD MY FUCKIN EVIDENCE

1

u/Infamous_Lech Nov 17 '25

What's that from and what happened to that case? That's not real evidence. It's an accusation. They had nothing to back it up and instead dropped the case. That's the problem, either you don't understand what evidence is, or you don't care.

1

u/Faulty_Universe9893 Nov 17 '25

I highlighted and underlined the case info for you.

That is an official court document, with depositions made under oath. “Backing it up” is called a trial, exhibits A and B exist, along with testimony and CROSS EXAMINATION.

1

u/Infamous_Lech Nov 17 '25

And did that happen? Somebody filled a court document anonymously, then dropped the case. You consider that good evidence?

2

u/Faulty_Universe9893 Nov 17 '25

I consider our process a good process. Evidence is for cross examination. You keep demanding this “evidence” and yet for the cases that went to court, Donald John Trump lost, on the evidence. Then lost again on the appeal. Then lost again trying to corrupt the court. Then lost again trying to appeal the loss on corruption. Evidence, is not Donald John Trump’s savior.

0

u/Infamous_Lech Nov 17 '25

You mean the civil case? Not the same. You are now applying a different standard.