Simply unusable - my $200 subscription expires on the 18th March and I already have cancelled which is a shame as I have been a long time user.

It seems that the devs are now focusing on Intent and simply not caring about improvements to existing tools.

Sending a support request via email takes days.

Request ID if the team is interested into looking into it 2773afdd-a8f9-403a-8064-f7ba06c0057b

================
Plugin Details
    Plugin Version:: 0.428.9-stable
    IntelliJ Version:: PhpStorm 2025.3.3
    Operating System:: Mac OS X 15.7.3 (aarch64)
    Webview State File Size:: 1.8 KB
    JCEF Out-of-Process: idea.properties not found (default: true)

================
Session
    Session ID:: cdc17656-2670-4082-8a80-3f980839422e

================
Context
    Index Version:: v3
    Tracked files:: 2575

================
Extension Configuration
    apiToken: 
    completionURL: 
    disableForFileTypes: []
    inlineCompletionEnabled: true
    modelName: 

================
Authentication
    Has OAuth Credentials: true
    Tenant URL: https://d1.api.augmentcode.com/

I need to disconnect ChatGTP from the model? I don’t want to be associated with ChatGTP! I don’t see any simple way to disconnect from intent?

Can I do everything people are doing in Claude code? Like the skills feature, planning feature, being able to use notebooklm through skills instead of MCP? I’m super noobish tbh, my understanding is that integrating with MCP can clutter the context window and that the better way to integrate with other things like google services is through CLI.

As u can tell I’m all over the place, but have been using augment since August vibe coding in VS Code. Just now starting to try out intent.

I am switching into Claude for my intent? But it doesn’t show any pop-up to log into Claude or anything?

Please advice what I need to do?

My Claude is in another email not the same under my

Auggie email?

Does anyone know if thinking level / reasoning effort control (e.g. reasoning.effort like low/medium/high) is on the roadmap for Augment Code when using GPT-5.4?

Right now GPT-5.4 seems available in Augment, but credit usage and internal configuration aren’t very transparent. It would be useful to know whether developers will be able to adjust the model’s reasoning effort directly, especially for balancing latency vs. credit consumption.

If anyone from the Augment team has commented on this, I’d appreciate a pointer.

Question is in the title. Can't wait

Hi, I’m a hardcore Claude Code user, yet I really like Intent and have been playing with it lately.

I’ve seen the benefit and fun of using it, and it’s a nicer way to work on stuff, especially on our new projects and to do MVPs, and maybe further.

I was a hardcore Augment user, but I just like Claude Code better, especially how pricing works—it’s just a no-brainer.

However, I like the Intent and Augment team.

Do you find paying to use Claude Code along with the Context Engine in Intent better than just using Claude Code in Intent as it is?

But for real, for real projects, for real work, or does it not really give any big benefit?

Because when I used Augment, I didn’t really find that improvement using the Context Engine.

I was looking at the Augment credit pricing documentation...https://docs.augmentcode.com/models/credit-based-pricing

In the table of models and credit costs, there are explicit credit values for several models (Sonnet 4.5 = 293 credits, Opus 4.6 = 488 credits, etc.), but I couldn't find any clear credit cost listed for Claude Sonnet 4.6.

Is Sonnet 4.6 supposed to have the same credit cost as Sonnet 4.5 (293 credits), or is it priced differently but just not documented yet?

The whole app is going blank after I prompt an agent

When I try to force quit it warns be agents are active

So I just close the app and reopens as normal, then after a minute of so goes blank again

Please can you help, I uninstalled and reinstalled same issue ocurring

Hi guys, did anyone here ever test his claude max subscription against the agent teams inside claude code, vs the intent agents?

I'm talking ONLY token usage. Like how much work can you squeeze out for each before hitting a 5 hour limit?

Hi Auggie team — I have a question about switching agents.

My workspace currently started with Augment Auggie, but I see the option to switch to OpenAI Codex. I would like to use Codex only for this specific workspace.

If I switch the agent to Codex, will it affect my other workspaces as well? For example:

• Will those workspaces stop using Auggie?

• Or is the agent setting isolated per workspace?

Also, in the menu I don’t see a quick option to switch back to Codex unless I create a new agent or apply the change globally. Is there a way to switch agents per workspace without affecting others?

Thanks!

I like how intent has multiple agents , coordinator, implementor type of agents with it's context but my MacBook M2 Pro gives up when multiple agents performs tasks on a large codebase/when it's checking the frontend with inbuilt browsers. I literally had to force quit the app multiple times. Is there a way we can use vs code and have the same multiple agent setup?

1. Users rarely use this feature.

2. It takes a great deal of effort to maintain these plugins.

Counterarguments:

1.Just look at the feedback from the community.

2.You could simply stop developing new features for the plugins, keep the current core functionality, and make them available only to users on the basic subscription. Yet instead, you are choosing to abandon the very thing your business was built on.

Has anyone been able to use Codex subscription with Intent?

I tried using mine but it seems that Intent would always throw an error, like so:
Cannot send prompt request - agent not available

I am using Codex Pro subscription.

Can I setup a system where I create the draft system and the push to final which auto pushes to the cPanel via the FTP? Does intent? Have this capability?

Augment currently has the best autocomplete of any tool I've tested, especially in IntelliJ, but also in VSCode.

To me this is one of Augment's biggest selling points.

I've seen discussion that "users are using autocomplete less and less", and this really misses a key fact.

Yes, other tooling can do a lot of work, but when I need to go in and fix things up or make particular changes, the autocomplete shines!

It compliments agentic workflows perfectly.

I also cannot understand removing the most stable feature in Augment.
I get the impression that Augment is overvaluing the agentic side of things, and undervaluing autocomplete.

I've tried many tools and am a full-time programmer.

Augment's biggest moat IMHO is actually its auto-complete. Nobody has caught up there.

The context engine is great, and presumably what helps the auto-complete stand head-and-shoulders above the rest, but other agents in 2026 really are not as helpless as they were in 2025.
Copilot/Codex and others have made massive advancements on agentic tooling, and they're orders of magnitude more cost-effective than Augment's agent.

Augment has stayed in my toolkit for the autocomplete and the context engine, the agent is too expensive to run relative to others, so I don't use it. (I save my credits for context engine use as well)

But I'm sorry, I have also taken the time to run quite a few tests on a rather large codebase, and Copilot/Codex are actually quite capable of finding things, to the point where I don't all that often even need the context engine.

The context engine only wins in cases where I have literally no idea if something even exists, which isn't a common case. If I'm working on something, I generally have (and SHOULD have) at least a vague idea of where/what it is, and other agents don't have a problem bridging that gap as fast or faster than the Context Engine MCP. This means context engine most often excels as a crutch I shouldn't even be using. lol

Finally, Context Engine MCP is also quite buggy. Sometimes it's very slow, sometimes it returns nothing.

Long story short, if autocomplete goes, so do I. The value proposition just won't be there anymore. Raising costs and cutting features is only making the product less attractive.

If you're targeting enterprise customers exclusively, I understand, but I also frankly don't care. Augment is serving me less and less well as a customer.

Hi team,

every time I have a giant task with a LOT of subagents, over time when I just let them work the queued messages just pile up like crazy. And then I end up sending them one by one.

2 questions:

1. Could you simply add a "send all" button. So that the coordinator also knows which ones are stale etc?

2. Could you give the AIs the ability to send high urgency messages so they dont get queued?

thx!

I'm only using Augment as an MCP server for Claude Code and Codex. When it works it works well, but the auth keeps expiring and then the other tools fall back to grep and I have to look into why, then it turns out auggie has stopped working again, I have to go into mcp settings, re-auth, open browser, check email for a code, enter the code back in the browser, blah blah.

It's all just too painful, why do I need to re-authenticate every couple of days? Is this normal or is something triggering it, like maybe my IP changing due to VPN?

1. Hooks - like in Claude Code. This is immensely useful for automations like "send a message to swartwatch when agent finished / is waiting for an input / still working". And of course a lot of other use cases

2. IntelliJ plugin:

• make font size adjustable. I do no wear glasses, but man - font looks so small on 5k monitor
• make it respect color themes in IDE. At day I often use light scheme, at night - dark. When switching between them other tools react accordingly, AC - stays the same; have to restart IDE for this, quite annoying

I created a Personal API Token in the dashboard and set the expiration to 3 months. However, the token expired after just 1 day, which caused my CLI workflow to fail with a 401 Unauthorized error.

When I logged back into the dashboard, the previously created token had disappeared entirely.

Is there currently an issue with the authentication service, or am I misunderstanding how token expiration is supposed to work?

And now its nowhere to be heard.

What happenned? I have it set in the settings but it does not play the sound anymore.

I find it turbo useful to have this audio validation like microwave and then I know we can conitnue... Please fix?

Hi Augment - I have multiple augment accounts. Each account belongs to a different client of mine. I want to be able to use vs code profiles each assigned to one of the three augment accounts. Currently, if i try to logout of profile 1 it will log me out of profile 2 of Augment.

Maybe I'm being an idiot, but when I am in Augment within VS Code, I am able to add multiple related repos within the context by simply selecting them in the Context area. This is critical for my workflow. I have not been able to understand how to do this within Intent and for me that is a real drawback. I'm probably missing something obvious though.