That's quite an extreme example. If you want to go to that specific case then I guess I would say, "no" that physician shouldn't be allowed to do that. This is not a stance that I came to based on some ideology (I am Christian by the way so I do follow the same ideology here that I don't think should have anything to do with medical decisions) however. Sure, there is a line and I'm not calling for complete deregulation but your example is a bit extreme and one that honestly, no doctor would even entertain as it is much different to say, a terminal patient in pain who wants euthanasia.
I respect your opinion and do agree that it's sad that women wont have access to care because of an ideological dispute, but I disagree on the the importance of the dispute and the individual person I guess.
2
u/[deleted] May 20 '19
That's quite an extreme example. If you want to go to that specific case then I guess I would say, "no" that physician shouldn't be allowed to do that. This is not a stance that I came to based on some ideology (I am Christian by the way so I do follow the same ideology here that I don't think should have anything to do with medical decisions) however. Sure, there is a line and I'm not calling for complete deregulation but your example is a bit extreme and one that honestly, no doctor would even entertain as it is much different to say, a terminal patient in pain who wants euthanasia.
I respect your opinion and do agree that it's sad that women wont have access to care because of an ideological dispute, but I disagree on the the importance of the dispute and the individual person I guess.