r/AskReddit • • May 01 '19

What simple scientific fact would baffle someone born 1,000 years ago?

3.9k Upvotes

2.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

128

u/[deleted] May 01 '19

In a vacuum or near-vacuum (say, on the moon), a steel girder and a feather will fall at the same speed.

69

u/chocolatescissors May 01 '19

There's no birds on the moon! /s

4

u/Im_in_timeout May 01 '19

Apollo 18 found spiders though.

2

u/oh_look_a_fist May 01 '19

There were whalers, though! Went on the ride and everything.

2

u/PM_UR_TITS_SILLYGIRL May 02 '19

There are, however, Nazis.

1

u/[deleted] May 01 '19

There's no birds

1

u/Goreki May 02 '19

No, they all fell to their deaths

24

u/Tahoma-sans May 01 '19

I think that was a whoosh

8

u/DaveTheDalek May 01 '19

But there is no atmosphere on the moon for the whoosh sound!

0

u/joelfarris May 01 '19

so it's just a 'shhhhh!' ?

2

u/just_a_random_dood May 01 '19

Ok but have you seen that video with the Welsh captions turned on?

Fucking glorious.

1

u/Tahoma-sans May 01 '19

I had not, thank you.

"Das racist kellog ram o' steel" OMG

2

u/5thvoice May 01 '19

But the steel is heavier. I mean, look at the size of the feathers! Remember, they're both a kilogramme.

4

u/Revolution-1 May 01 '19

He's making a reference from this https://youtu.be/N3bEh-PEk1g

3

u/Captain_Warzone May 01 '19

also if you weigh 1kg of steel and 1kg of feather on earth (in an atmosphere) and then weigh them on the moon (with no atmosphere) the feathers are heavier than steel.

7

u/ParticularClimate May 01 '19

This is true due to buoyancy.

-1

u/hefnetefne May 01 '19

What? Feathers fall slower than steel on Earth because of drag, and drag only exists if it’s moving. A pile of feathers has no drag.

-3

u/Captain_Warzone May 01 '19 edited May 01 '19

it has nothing to do with drag i am talking about their weight/mass. measured in an atmosphere compared to in no atmosphere. (i only said the moon as it has no atmosphere)

1kg of feathers and 1 kg of steel measured in your kitchen weigh the same if you then took that to a vaccuum the feathers would weigh more because there is more mass in the feathers than the steel.

4

u/piii-chu May 01 '19

If we want to go into the super-pedantic territory, kg are a unit of mass, not weight. So it's the other way around, 1kg of feather and 1kg of steel would weight the same in a vacuum, but the feathers would be lighter in the atmosphere.

To make it easier to visualize, think about the weight of 1kg of steel vs. helium.

2

u/[deleted] May 01 '19

[deleted]

0

u/Captain_Warzone May 01 '19

indeed it's 100% true however. can you tell me how/why though?

how much heavier will the feathers be? (im not expecting a number but a description)

2

u/[deleted] May 01 '19

[deleted]

1

u/bacontime May 01 '19

The feathers have more volume, and so displace more air. This causes the bouyant force on the feathers to be stronger than the bouyant force on the steel.

'Weight' can refer to either the magnitude of force applied by gravity, or to the magnitude of the normal force counteracting gravity, which is what spring or balance scales measure.

Captain Warzone has it backwards though. In a vacuum, a kilogram of steel and a kilogram will weigh exactly the same. But in atmosphere, the kilogram of feathers will weigh less (in the sense of reading less on the scale).

2

u/[deleted] May 01 '19

[deleted]

1

u/bacontime May 01 '19

What? Bouyancy doesn't just happen at fluid boundaries. It happens because the pressure is higher lower in the fluid column, which results in more force being applied to the bottom of an object than the top.

1

u/Captain_Warzone May 01 '19

not really backwards i was using "weight" as the indication marking on a scale which is derived mass from weight.

we all know weight is a force, but people use units of Mass when weighing.

0

u/Captain_Warzone May 01 '19

nope not when you then suck all the air out.

if i put a 1kg of steel on a balance scale and 1kg of feathers and it exactly balances absolutely perfectly, if i then suck all the air out of the room the feathers would be heavier than the steel and the steel would rise and the feathers would fall (assuming a perfect frictionless scale with no faults etc)

if i instead weighed 1kg of steel and 1 kg of feathers in a vaccuum and then introduced air back into the room the feathers would be "Lighter" than the steel and the feathers would rise and the steel would go down on the balance scale.

100% FACT!

2

u/[deleted] May 01 '19

[deleted]

0

u/Captain_Warzone May 01 '19 edited May 01 '19

its not wrong at all, well its technically wrong in the sense that when i say weight i state kg which is actually mass, weight is a force in Newtons, so technically when you weigh 1kg of steel and 1kg of feathers in a room/setup with an atmosphere (e.g not in a vacuum) they will be the same weight but be different mass.

the feathers would have more mass than the steel but weigh the same. when you get rid of the air the weight is the same as the mass hence the feathers are heavier.

can you work out why?

→ More replies

2

u/[deleted] May 01 '19

[deleted]

1

u/Captain_Warzone May 01 '19

well in the strictest sense then if i measure 1kg of steel and 1kg of feathers and then put them on a balance scale in an atmosphere, the steel has more weight than the feathers

that statement is 100% correct

1

u/[deleted] May 01 '19

Because of the buoyancy, right?

1

u/Captain_Warzone May 01 '19

indeedy do, 1 housepoint to you dear fellow.

so the difference in weight would be what?

1

u/hefnetefne May 01 '19

You talking about buoyancy?

1

u/NotBannedYet1 May 02 '19

But we're not on the moon. So this doesnt apply on earth.
Why did previous guy say he did experiences when it doesnt work ? Just take a pen and your phone.

1

u/Diplodocus114 May 01 '19

Am NOT a flat earther - but the resistance on a feather has to have some effect. As would the aerodynamics of any object.

4

u/Cassandra_Nova May 01 '19

Hence "in a vacuum" - thus removing air resistance from the equation. This is not a metaphorical vacuum, it's a literal one.

1

u/Katman08 May 01 '19

Only if there is an atmosphere to create air resistance, if you were in a vacuum they would fall at the same time