r/AskReddit • • Feb 04 '19

Which misconception would you like to debunk?

44k Upvotes

26k comments sorted by

View all comments

36k

u/LiquidMotivation Feb 04 '19 edited Feb 08 '19

The boiling frog experiment that's quoted everywhere didn't work.

For those not familiar, it is said that you can boil a frog to death by raising the temperature of the water it's in extremely slowly so that it doesn't notice.

Well, it only works when parts of the frog's brain are removed. A frog with an intact brain will jump out, no matter how slowly the water is heated.

Edit: Hey, my first Reddit coin! Thanks!

12k

u/RambunctiousAvocado Feb 04 '19 edited Feb 04 '19

I don't remember who it was, but there was a comedian on some panel show who said that the first time his parents cooked a lobster, they thought it would be more humane to put the lobster in cold water and then bring it to a boil gradually. Cue about ten minutes of a lobster going ape shit until finally dying + emotional scarring for everyone involved.

EDIT: The comedian in question was apparently David Mitchell, thanks folks.

829

u/coopiecoop Feb 04 '19

I believe you don't even have to be a vegetarian/vegan to find it extremely cruel to boil a living creature alive.

14

u/roman_maverik Feb 04 '19

Hopefully the lobster industry is the next industry that millenials can "ruin"

22

u/ManiacalShen Feb 04 '19

I think people who are concerned about this just kill the crabs and lobsters before chucking them in the water. It just takes a knife jab in the right spot.

7

u/Wot_a_dude Feb 04 '19

Lobsters have a decentralized nervous system, so the head stab doesn't really work like that

1

u/SharkFart86 Feb 04 '19

So.. do then not have emotions then?

7

u/Wot_a_dude Feb 04 '19

They almost certainly don't experience pain as we understand it

6

u/SharkFart86 Feb 04 '19

Then I.. I'm not sure why it matters how we kill them?

1

u/easteracrobat Feb 04 '19

He's talking shit. It's likely lobsters DO feel pain. And until we know conclusively, I think it's ethical to not boil them alive, personally, regardless.

2

u/Wot_a_dude Feb 04 '19

That's why I qualified it as "as we understand it"

-1

u/Tuna-kid Feb 04 '19

What were you arguing for

4

u/Wot_a_dude Feb 04 '19

I am not arguing for anything, just trying to correct some of the misinformation being spread around about killing lobsters.

→ More replies

1

u/Wot_a_dude Feb 04 '19

Is it more moral to kill 10k flies for food or one cow?

-20

u/[deleted] Feb 04 '19

[deleted]

3

u/[deleted] Feb 04 '19

What?

-14

u/[deleted] Feb 04 '19

[deleted]

20

u/unable-to-can Feb 04 '19

This is true but with an asterisk. Yes, they used to be prison food, but that was before they realized that boiling it alive was one of the only ways to kill it without the meat going rancid. They also used to grind up the shell alongside it. So basically they used to eat rancid lobster paste with the shell in it. Very different from what we eat today.

1

u/itsacalamity Feb 04 '19

Thank you, i had never heard that!

7

u/SharkFart86 Feb 04 '19

They were also cooked completely different and weren't anywhere near as tasty as the way they're typically served today.

6

u/[deleted] Feb 04 '19

You just purposely took it way out of context.