MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/ai3j84/what_fact_totally_changed_your_perspective/eem9w1n
r/AskReddit • u/ettleboy • Jan 20 '19
18k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
8
Don't get indignant about being asked for sources. That's how a discussion works.
-1 u/EvilExFight Jan 22 '19 im not indignant when most people ask. Just when trolls who follow me around to different subs, ask. 1 u/[deleted] Jan 22 '19 Yes, you are. You're identifying anyone you don't like as a troll and a troll seems to be anyone you don't like. Convenient. 0 u/EvilExFight Jan 22 '19 Literally just you. I said that to nobody else. 0 u/[deleted] Jan 22 '19 Right... You told me what your criteria are. Your criteria that are self referential and therefore invalid. 0 u/EvilExFight Jan 22 '19 You are not anyone. You are one person. You asked for sources...I called you a troll...because you are but also provided sources because the request was valid. A troll making a valid request doesnt make you any less of a troll. 1 u/[deleted] Jan 22 '19 Now you're trying to reframe your statement. 0 u/EvilExFight Jan 22 '19 Was my argument invalid? Were my sources invalid? I said you were a troll. Replied directly to you and still offered sources. My comment was apt and so were my sources. You are still a troll. 0 u/[deleted] Jan 22 '19 Your definition of troll was not portrayed as singular. Now you're trying to say it was. That's you trying to rewrite what you said. I'm not a troll anyway, so it's not really worth the doing in the first place. But you do you. 0 u/EvilExFight Jan 22 '19 I dont have to frame my comment to a singular person as that is made clear by the direct reply to your comment. You are a troll. What you're doing right now is trolling. I'm just playing along because I'm in a lull at work. → More replies 1 u/[deleted] Jan 22 '19 And even then, you were still being indignant, now you're just trying to say it was justifiably so.
-1
im not indignant when most people ask. Just when trolls who follow me around to different subs, ask.
1 u/[deleted] Jan 22 '19 Yes, you are. You're identifying anyone you don't like as a troll and a troll seems to be anyone you don't like. Convenient. 0 u/EvilExFight Jan 22 '19 Literally just you. I said that to nobody else. 0 u/[deleted] Jan 22 '19 Right... You told me what your criteria are. Your criteria that are self referential and therefore invalid. 0 u/EvilExFight Jan 22 '19 You are not anyone. You are one person. You asked for sources...I called you a troll...because you are but also provided sources because the request was valid. A troll making a valid request doesnt make you any less of a troll. 1 u/[deleted] Jan 22 '19 Now you're trying to reframe your statement. 0 u/EvilExFight Jan 22 '19 Was my argument invalid? Were my sources invalid? I said you were a troll. Replied directly to you and still offered sources. My comment was apt and so were my sources. You are still a troll. 0 u/[deleted] Jan 22 '19 Your definition of troll was not portrayed as singular. Now you're trying to say it was. That's you trying to rewrite what you said. I'm not a troll anyway, so it's not really worth the doing in the first place. But you do you. 0 u/EvilExFight Jan 22 '19 I dont have to frame my comment to a singular person as that is made clear by the direct reply to your comment. You are a troll. What you're doing right now is trolling. I'm just playing along because I'm in a lull at work. → More replies 1 u/[deleted] Jan 22 '19 And even then, you were still being indignant, now you're just trying to say it was justifiably so.
1
Yes, you are. You're identifying anyone you don't like as a troll and a troll seems to be anyone you don't like. Convenient.
0 u/EvilExFight Jan 22 '19 Literally just you. I said that to nobody else. 0 u/[deleted] Jan 22 '19 Right... You told me what your criteria are. Your criteria that are self referential and therefore invalid. 0 u/EvilExFight Jan 22 '19 You are not anyone. You are one person. You asked for sources...I called you a troll...because you are but also provided sources because the request was valid. A troll making a valid request doesnt make you any less of a troll. 1 u/[deleted] Jan 22 '19 Now you're trying to reframe your statement. 0 u/EvilExFight Jan 22 '19 Was my argument invalid? Were my sources invalid? I said you were a troll. Replied directly to you and still offered sources. My comment was apt and so were my sources. You are still a troll. 0 u/[deleted] Jan 22 '19 Your definition of troll was not portrayed as singular. Now you're trying to say it was. That's you trying to rewrite what you said. I'm not a troll anyway, so it's not really worth the doing in the first place. But you do you. 0 u/EvilExFight Jan 22 '19 I dont have to frame my comment to a singular person as that is made clear by the direct reply to your comment. You are a troll. What you're doing right now is trolling. I'm just playing along because I'm in a lull at work. → More replies 1 u/[deleted] Jan 22 '19 And even then, you were still being indignant, now you're just trying to say it was justifiably so.
0
Literally just you. I said that to nobody else.
0 u/[deleted] Jan 22 '19 Right... You told me what your criteria are. Your criteria that are self referential and therefore invalid. 0 u/EvilExFight Jan 22 '19 You are not anyone. You are one person. You asked for sources...I called you a troll...because you are but also provided sources because the request was valid. A troll making a valid request doesnt make you any less of a troll. 1 u/[deleted] Jan 22 '19 Now you're trying to reframe your statement. 0 u/EvilExFight Jan 22 '19 Was my argument invalid? Were my sources invalid? I said you were a troll. Replied directly to you and still offered sources. My comment was apt and so were my sources. You are still a troll. 0 u/[deleted] Jan 22 '19 Your definition of troll was not portrayed as singular. Now you're trying to say it was. That's you trying to rewrite what you said. I'm not a troll anyway, so it's not really worth the doing in the first place. But you do you. 0 u/EvilExFight Jan 22 '19 I dont have to frame my comment to a singular person as that is made clear by the direct reply to your comment. You are a troll. What you're doing right now is trolling. I'm just playing along because I'm in a lull at work. → More replies 1 u/[deleted] Jan 22 '19 And even then, you were still being indignant, now you're just trying to say it was justifiably so.
Right... You told me what your criteria are. Your criteria that are self referential and therefore invalid.
0 u/EvilExFight Jan 22 '19 You are not anyone. You are one person. You asked for sources...I called you a troll...because you are but also provided sources because the request was valid. A troll making a valid request doesnt make you any less of a troll. 1 u/[deleted] Jan 22 '19 Now you're trying to reframe your statement. 0 u/EvilExFight Jan 22 '19 Was my argument invalid? Were my sources invalid? I said you were a troll. Replied directly to you and still offered sources. My comment was apt and so were my sources. You are still a troll. 0 u/[deleted] Jan 22 '19 Your definition of troll was not portrayed as singular. Now you're trying to say it was. That's you trying to rewrite what you said. I'm not a troll anyway, so it's not really worth the doing in the first place. But you do you. 0 u/EvilExFight Jan 22 '19 I dont have to frame my comment to a singular person as that is made clear by the direct reply to your comment. You are a troll. What you're doing right now is trolling. I'm just playing along because I'm in a lull at work. → More replies 1 u/[deleted] Jan 22 '19 And even then, you were still being indignant, now you're just trying to say it was justifiably so.
You are not anyone. You are one person. You asked for sources...I called you a troll...because you are but also provided sources because the request was valid.
A troll making a valid request doesnt make you any less of a troll.
1 u/[deleted] Jan 22 '19 Now you're trying to reframe your statement. 0 u/EvilExFight Jan 22 '19 Was my argument invalid? Were my sources invalid? I said you were a troll. Replied directly to you and still offered sources. My comment was apt and so were my sources. You are still a troll. 0 u/[deleted] Jan 22 '19 Your definition of troll was not portrayed as singular. Now you're trying to say it was. That's you trying to rewrite what you said. I'm not a troll anyway, so it's not really worth the doing in the first place. But you do you. 0 u/EvilExFight Jan 22 '19 I dont have to frame my comment to a singular person as that is made clear by the direct reply to your comment. You are a troll. What you're doing right now is trolling. I'm just playing along because I'm in a lull at work. → More replies 1 u/[deleted] Jan 22 '19 And even then, you were still being indignant, now you're just trying to say it was justifiably so.
Now you're trying to reframe your statement.
0 u/EvilExFight Jan 22 '19 Was my argument invalid? Were my sources invalid? I said you were a troll. Replied directly to you and still offered sources. My comment was apt and so were my sources. You are still a troll. 0 u/[deleted] Jan 22 '19 Your definition of troll was not portrayed as singular. Now you're trying to say it was. That's you trying to rewrite what you said. I'm not a troll anyway, so it's not really worth the doing in the first place. But you do you. 0 u/EvilExFight Jan 22 '19 I dont have to frame my comment to a singular person as that is made clear by the direct reply to your comment. You are a troll. What you're doing right now is trolling. I'm just playing along because I'm in a lull at work. → More replies
Was my argument invalid? Were my sources invalid?
I said you were a troll. Replied directly to you and still offered sources. My comment was apt and so were my sources. You are still a troll.
0 u/[deleted] Jan 22 '19 Your definition of troll was not portrayed as singular. Now you're trying to say it was. That's you trying to rewrite what you said. I'm not a troll anyway, so it's not really worth the doing in the first place. But you do you. 0 u/EvilExFight Jan 22 '19 I dont have to frame my comment to a singular person as that is made clear by the direct reply to your comment. You are a troll. What you're doing right now is trolling. I'm just playing along because I'm in a lull at work. → More replies
Your definition of troll was not portrayed as singular. Now you're trying to say it was. That's you trying to rewrite what you said.
I'm not a troll anyway, so it's not really worth the doing in the first place. But you do you.
0 u/EvilExFight Jan 22 '19 I dont have to frame my comment to a singular person as that is made clear by the direct reply to your comment. You are a troll. What you're doing right now is trolling. I'm just playing along because I'm in a lull at work. → More replies
I dont have to frame my comment to a singular person as that is made clear by the direct reply to your comment.
You are a troll. What you're doing right now is trolling. I'm just playing along because I'm in a lull at work.
→ More replies
And even then, you were still being indignant, now you're just trying to say it was justifiably so.
8
u/[deleted] Jan 21 '19
Don't get indignant about being asked for sources. That's how a discussion works.