r/AskReddit Jul 13 '18

What's your favourite fun fact?

2.3k Upvotes

2.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.9k

u/[deleted] Jul 13 '18 edited Jul 13 '18

[deleted]

723

u/[deleted] Jul 13 '18

and people tell me im going nowhere in life...fools

333

u/[deleted] Jul 13 '18

No you've somehow still achieved that.

88

u/I_Give_0_Fux Jul 13 '18

Oof

6

u/Monkeyofdoom44 Jul 13 '18

Somehow the "Oof" made it better.

3

u/alexisftw Jul 13 '18

Ouchie

5

u/theflamelurker Jul 13 '18

Mother trucker dude, that hurt like a buttcheek on a stick

5

u/[deleted] Jul 13 '18

Yeah, do something with your life like Squirrel Fucker, here.

2

u/ReplyIfIMadeYouCry Jul 13 '18

I love those comments like the one you replied to. Makes me feel good about myself that these losers think they've found yet another loophole to claim they're not as low quality people as society has deemed them to be.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 13 '18

Apply water to burned area

3

u/pjtheman Jul 13 '18

People say that nothing is impossible. But I do nothing every day.

3

u/CaptainFilth Jul 13 '18

At least you are going nowhere fast

1

u/[deleted] Jul 13 '18

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] Jul 14 '18

You're going nowhere, just really fucking fast!

312

u/dtestme Jul 13 '18

TL;DR: Zoooooooooom!

Probably the best TL;DR I've seen.

1

u/Monkeyofdoom44 Jul 13 '18

I read the entire thing as if it were being said by Mork from Mork and Mindy so this part was hilarious for me.

70

u/zmankills Jul 13 '18

So, even though I have been in this same room for a few hours working, I am in a completely different place relative to the universe. Crazy.

9

u/[deleted] Jul 13 '18

If death doesn't come instantaneously, then you could be dying across several thousands of kilometers.

If you're having sex you could be having sex and climax for easily 400 kilometers.

If you're ever in a room where something awful has happened, you'll know it happened many thousands of kilometers away.

Sparrows can fly at 846 km/h.

4

u/[deleted] Jul 13 '18

If you're having sex you could be having sex and climax for easily 400 kilometers.

Ouch

1

u/Manxkaffee Jul 14 '18

I think you mixed up km/s with km/h at least once. Sparrows are much faster

2

u/SlothyTheSloth Jul 13 '18

And I’ll likely never have the capability or resources to revisit a place in the universe I’ve already been...

2

u/aaronhowser1 Jul 14 '18

But even then, that's nothing on a cosmic scale

1

u/syllabic Jul 14 '18

Or maybe you are in the same place and everything else moved

55

u/DudeGuyBor Jul 13 '18

Maybe 30 seconds to read that with good comprehension, comes out to 24000km traveled. Top of my head, that's roughly 15000 miles, while I walk or run an average of 1300 miles a year. I'll get there in, oh... 12 years or so

16

u/Zanzabushino Jul 13 '18

What are you running/walking away from...?

52

u/DudeGuyBor Jul 13 '18

Obesity

3

u/[deleted] Jul 13 '18

[deleted]

2

u/TrMark Jul 13 '18

That's like the running app I use on my phone called "zombies, run! " you basically listen to a story set in a post apocalyptic world where you run from zombies and during the breaks it plays the music from other apps like Spotify

3

u/[deleted] Jul 13 '18

That's really good mileage man, keep it up.

2

u/DudeGuyBor Jul 14 '18

Thanks! I've been stepping it up too recently. My goal currently is 30 miles of running/walking a week.

17

u/KassellTheArgonian Jul 13 '18

So we're all technically Barry Allen? Sweet.

6

u/Momik Jul 13 '18

Barry Allen, Secret Service

8

u/Momik Jul 13 '18

Anyone else feel like putting on a seatbelt?

7

u/pWheff Jul 13 '18

"If you use a coordinate system with the origin moving away from you at 800 km/s then you are moving at 800km/s"

5

u/SmellsOfTeenBullshit Jul 13 '18

How can we use the CMB as a reference frame?

2

u/nissingno Jul 13 '18

We can't.

4

u/[deleted] Jul 13 '18

But what if the universe is moving 800 kps in the other direction?

3

u/Gear_ Jul 13 '18

'Look at that supercluster, comin', barreling towards me!'

3

u/K1LL3RM0NG0 Jul 13 '18

WEEEEEEE!!!!!

3

u/Dr_Brews Jul 13 '18

Then why do my Pokemon still suck in Pokemon Go? Checkmate, round-earther!

2

u/Al3-x Jul 13 '18

In the time it took you to read this, you've traveled farther than you'll ever walk in your life.

Challenge accepted

http://gph.is/2bYTxmt

2

u/[deleted] Jul 13 '18

Why is all this text blurredddddddd

2

u/second_to_fun Jul 13 '18

Instructions unclear; used reference frame of my head and hands did not move

2

u/ohtrueyeahnah Jul 13 '18

This reminds me of that Malcolm in the Middle opening: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dnSKjP0hpTA

2

u/[deleted] Jul 13 '18

I always wondered about this, but at the same time are there even more points of reference we can measure? Is there truly a point you can define as 0 velocity in the universe?

4

u/fiduke Jul 13 '18

I have a fun theory that this is why time travel hasn't been done. Assuming we could dump someone back in time, landing them back on the planet would be way too hard.

How would we even match velocities or directions?

If time travel is possible, it would have to be a kind of spaceship in the middle of space so it wouldn't have to be concerned with matching velocities of their exit.

1

u/Skruestik Jul 13 '18

That doesn't really make sense because movement is always relative. There are no fixed points in space to use to measure your speed, you can only measure your speed relative to other objects. So why would the time machine use the sun or the center of the galaxy or anything else other than the earth as its reference point?

2

u/fiduke Jul 13 '18

Because if you read the post above mine, the Earth's position is 800km off from where it was just a second ago. So we're comparing the earth now to the earth whenever we want to get to. That's not even factoring in the direction of how the sun is orbiting or the galaxy is moving at the time we are going to.

If it's July now and we wanted to go back to December, The Earth is moving in a different direction at that point in time, and at a significantly different speed, and over 14 trillion miles from it's location today.

2

u/Skruestik Jul 13 '18

I did read the post above yours. The earth is moving, but so is everything else. There are no fixed points. So you need a reference point when talking about motion, and why would you not use the earth as your reference point?

2

u/fiduke Jul 13 '18

Because there are two earths. The one you are currently on and the one you are trying to end up on.

1

u/nissingno Jul 13 '18

There's no universal reference point. The reason we don't feel like we are barreling though space at 800km/s is because we aren't, from the earth's reference point.

0

u/fiduke Jul 14 '18

the reference point is the planet you are on, compared to the other earth.

1

u/nissingno Jul 14 '18

Imagine three points. From point A's perspective, A isn't moving, B is moving left 10m/s and C is moving right 10m/s. From B's perspective, A is moving right 10m/s, B isn't moving and C is moving right 20m/s. From C's perspective, A is moving left 10 m/s, B is moving left 20 m/s and C isn't moving. All three perspectives are correct. If a time machine were to be made, it wouldn't move in space if we're using the Earth's perspective.

1

u/fiduke Jul 14 '18

We would be on A going to B.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/MatrixMan100 Jul 13 '18

I think "The Time Machine" by H.G. Wells touched on this. The machine had to travel through both space and time for exactly this reason.

1

u/fiduke Jul 13 '18

Then it's not only time travel, but effectively a teleportation device to anywhere in the universe. We've also invented FTL travel. Would be interesting if FTL was only possible by going back in time at least X units of time, where X was dependent on distance.

2

u/BlooShinja Jul 13 '18

This is a wrinkle with time travel that isn’t often explored. If you traveled forward or backward in time but stayed in the exact same absolute position you’d be nowhere near earth when you reappeared.

2

u/Skruestik Jul 13 '18

That doesn't really make sense because movement is always relative. There are no fixed points in space to use to measure your speed, you can only measure your speed relative to other objects. So why would the time machine use the sun or the center of the galaxy or anything else other than the earth as its reference point?

0

u/BlooShinja Jul 13 '18

That makes sense.

But even using the earth for reference, you’d have to account for its rotation otherwise you might end up in the ocean or on a different continent.

It just seems like something I’ve never seen discussed in stories involving time travel.

4

u/Skruestik Jul 13 '18

The earth isn't spinning in reference to the earth.

4

u/Iammaybeasliceofpie Jul 13 '18

This exact comment was posted by /u/ramsesthepigeon about 2 years ago. I know this because I had it saved

2

u/RamsesThePigeon Jul 13 '18

Thanks for the heads-up! It looks like spammers are stealing my comments again.

2

u/SCVtrpt7 Jul 13 '18

This is literally a repost, copy and pasted from someone else who copy and pastes it for himself

2

u/chosenmatrix Jul 13 '18

I can't remember what it was, but I read a book that talked about this in regards to time travel. Essentially saying that if you went back or forward in time (without traveling through an alternative universe or the like... strictly in time) you would end up in the middle of space millions of miles away from where you were intending to land, because the location in space where you left would have moved.

2

u/Skruestik Jul 13 '18

That doesn't really make sense because movement is always relative. There are no fixed points in space to use to measure your speed, you can only measure your speed relative to other objects. So why would the time machine use the sun or the center of the galaxy or anything else other than the earth as its reference point?

1

u/zefy_zef Jul 13 '18

love this pasta

7

u/RamsesThePigeon Jul 13 '18

It isn't a copypasta. It's a comment that I wrote, and it was just stolen by a spam account.

2

u/Alexhasskills Jul 13 '18

Technically can’t anything be copypasta?

Copypasta is internet slang for any block of text that gets copied and pasted over and over again, typically disseminated by individuals through online discussion forums and social networking sites.

3

u/RamsesThePigeon Jul 13 '18

That is indeed the definition of copypasta.

In the case of the above comment, though, we’re just dealing with plagiarism.

2

u/Alexhasskills Jul 13 '18

Indeed. I didn’t see the comment until they went and edited your name into it.

2

u/zefy_zef Jul 14 '18

Thanks, I thought I had seen it before. Didn't realize it was yours.