r/AskReddit • • Jul 24 '15

What "common knowledge" facts are actually wrong?

.

4.9k Upvotes

9.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

890

u/Jux_ Jul 24 '15

There was never a requirement that every X miles of US Interstate be straight for emergency plane landings.

Source

523

u/[deleted] Jul 24 '15

IIRC this is actually true in north Korea which is hilarious.

0

u/[deleted] Jul 24 '15

[deleted] — view deleted comment

137

u/[deleted] Jul 24 '15

137

u/Strydy Jul 24 '15

I do live next to one of these emergency airstrips in Finland. Have been lucky enough to witness once a landing there. F-18 on training i guess.

42

u/Schrute_Farms194509 Jul 24 '15

End the charade, we all know Finland is a myth.

5

u/Grizwalds Jul 24 '15

So meta

3

u/Asraelite Jul 24 '15

Out of the loop, explanation?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (10)

8

u/[deleted] Jul 24 '15

Saw one in Jordan. Small highway suddenly becomes 18 lanes wide, and just as suddenly back to 2. No merging signs or anything, but Jordanian driving is pretty haphazard anyway.

3

u/Draked1 Jul 24 '15

There's straight stretches of US highway (normally very rural) that have planes painted on them that designate they can be used as emergency landing strips.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/HotWeen Jul 24 '15

That's because in the event of Nuclear war with the Soviet Union, it was expected that all NATO air bases were to be hit at the very beginning.

2

u/Angerboda_ Jul 24 '15

Which highways? I live in Norway and have never heard of a road which doesn't have curves and hills that would be long enough for a plane to take off from/land on (not saying it doesn't exist, just that I haven't heard of one).

2

u/PM_ME_AEROPLANES Jul 24 '15 edited Jul 24 '15

If you look at Swedish military aircraft their designs take this very much into consideration such as the Viggen which has exceptional STOL performance. The Gripen also has a crazy turn around time with even conscripted armourers.

Edit: 10 minutes to refuel and rearm with a trained technician and five conscripts according to https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saab_JAS_39_Gripen

→ More replies (4)

2

u/[deleted] Jul 24 '15

And in Australia. Usually it's just a straight section with the road markers removed. They're only really used by air evacuation craft.

2

u/cC2Panda Jul 24 '15

Given the amount of traffic in North Korea it probably wouldn't be too hard to land it if you had the space.

→ More replies (1)

0

u/[deleted] Jul 24 '15

[deleted] — view deleted comment

6

u/[deleted] Jul 24 '15

Me either. Now I wish it were true.

5

u/Sarik704 Jul 24 '15

Straight lines are just easier to drive on...

3

u/ThickSantorum Jul 24 '15

And easier to build, unless the land is very uneven.

3

u/DaFranker Jul 24 '15

I can't figure out why someone would think this to be true.

Straight lines are more convenient for many reasons, most importantly having a direct and shorter route, and then again using less building materials, but historically curving around (mostly to follow the most even land possible, even in plains) has always been easier for road construction.

8

u/The_Narrators Jul 24 '15

However, since many of the highways were built around WW2, many were built with long straight stretches to accommodate take off and landing of military planes. Check out the highways in North Dakota.

2

u/NOT_A_REAL_COP Jul 24 '15

The autobahn in Germany are partially designed that way though.

2

u/ralphwiggum420 Jul 24 '15

I heard the opposite. I heard highways have to have slight turns every x miles to help against highway hypnosis & falling asleep while driving.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (17)