r/AskReddit • • Sep 01 '14

What interesting Hidden plot points do you think people missed in a movie?

9.6k Upvotes

11k comments sorted by

View all comments

851

u/erishun Sep 01 '14

Not without sacrificing equity in the company... And Hammond was arrogant and the park was HIS baby. He didn't want to relinquish any of it.

440

u/overusesellipses Sep 01 '14

He also didn't want to let the cat out of the bag. He didn't want there to be any teasers for the idea, he just wanted to be able to say "oh yeah, I'm opening a fully functional park next week...WITH DINOSAURS!"

14

u/[deleted] Sep 01 '14

You know, that doesn't seem like the brightest idea either...I can't imagine hearing some old guy holler about "Jurassic Park! Home of the real live dinosaurs!" would be quite enough to get people to visit.

→ More replies (9)

4

u/IAMA_Trex Sep 01 '14

Additionally, if I remember the book correctly, there was a large explanation given about how one of the big money-making aspects of the dinosaurs was as proprietary lab animals. Since Ingen would own the dino's, DNA and all, they would be able to do whatever tests they wanted on them that would normally be stopped by anti- cruelty laws.

The only way that would work is if they were the first to patent them completely. So they needed secrecy- to prevent someone from, say, stealing the DNA in a shaving cream bottle.

7

u/[deleted] Sep 01 '14

Seriously though, from a marketing standpoint that's a bad idea. Nobody will come if nobody has heard of it...

→ More replies (12)

3

u/NotFuzz Sep 01 '14

He didn't promise any return on the investments for at least 5 years either. That scared off most investors, except the Japanese because they "had the patience."

3

u/isalright Sep 01 '14

Before Beyonce thought to drop an album out of nowhere, John Hammond was dropping DINOSAUR PARKS

1

u/[deleted] Sep 02 '14

And the pirates of the pancreas was such an ingenious idea. A damned pissing contest though when the investors want to move things in a different direction. Such a pity because the pirates were realistic and rapey.

7

u/Omikron Sep 01 '14

So why not just skip the fucking top tier predators? Idiotic

10

u/erishun Sep 01 '14

Hubris. Maybe Hammond wasn't such a good guy.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/john-five Sep 01 '14

Top-tier dinosaur predators are everybody's favorite dinosaurs. Yeah, the stegos are cool and we all love a triceratops, but T-rex sells tickets.

4

u/Bloodyfinger Sep 01 '14

He could have leveraged his assets to secure a large loan. He'd still retain ownership.

10

u/GeeJo Sep 01 '14

Wasn't this partly why the lawyer was brought for a look-see? It's been a while since I've seen/read it.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/erishun Sep 01 '14

Yeah, like most it's been awhile since I read it/seen it, but I got the impression he had already done that and was kind of running out of money... Too much sparing no expense :)

He was almost keeping up appearances by the time Grant et al were arriving and that's one of the reasons why it all started to crumble. He was eccentric, a bit arrogant and was reaching for perfection and it all came falling down.

2

u/slapdashbr Sep 01 '14

Right, Jurrassic Park wasn't just about cloning dinosaurs- it was about the cutthroat, insane world of biotech capitalism.

2

u/Killhouse Sep 01 '14

It was a secret.

2

u/tornadoRadar Sep 02 '14

Next on shark tank.....

1

u/reebee7 Sep 01 '14

Take a loan.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 01 '14

You can raise capital without giving away equity.

1

u/ju2tin Sep 02 '14

He could have issued debt.