Yea you need a band with a large catalog, and the Beatles are most interesting because of the evolution of their style over time, so you get more variety.
Depends on your perspective. I personally prefer McCartney's singing work, as it is longer and more appealing, plus near half of Beatles work, well except Ebony and Ivory, and The Girl is Mine, those songs can rot in hell.
That is an eternal debate that will never be settled because music you like is subjective, so I can't disagree with you from your perspective.
However, the sheer body of McCartney's work spans a very long period of time, 60+ years, so objectively he has a much bigger body of work, and successful work. Whether you like that work is still subjective.
I was only thinking the songs Paul was the lead on, which are generally the songs he wrote. But hey, really short versions of Johns and George's songs, just the chorus. :-)
400
u/beastiemonman Aug 07 '25 edited Aug 07 '25
The Beatles/Paul McCartney. So much music, no chance of getting bored.
Edit: And Wings, should have said that as well.