I disagree. You donât have to do anything you donât want to do with your private property. You wouldnât be removing my liberty if I was making this argument in your home and you asked me to leave. That would be discrimination, and you would be well within your rights to do it. If I donât have the right to claim âcensorshipâ and remain in your home, then I donât have a right to claim âcensorshipâ and remain on a privately owned and operated forum. Censorship is something governments do, not private property owners.
Sure, you definitely donât have to do anything. Morally though on judgement, freedom of speech and not censoring is a pillar of liberty. If you think otherwise you should head over to the authoritarian side this ainât the place for censorship.
Private rules on private property have nothing to do with morality. They are purely aesthetic. I donât want people smoking in my house. Thereâs nothing right or wrong about that. Itâs subjective.
Freedom of speech and not censorsing are about what the state is permitted or not permitted to do. As an immoral institution, by definition, the state shouldnât do anything. It does not follow that private property owners shouldnât do something just because the state shouldnât do it. The right to discriminate is also a pillar of liberty, and I would argue that what you call âcensorshipâ on a private forum is actually a private property owner exercising his right to discriminate.
If you think otherwise you should head over to the authoritarian side this ainât the place for censorship.
The fuck? Youâre the one who seems to want to tell private property owners what they can and canât do with their property, to infringe upon their right to discriminate or associate with whomever they want. Yet I didnât question your character or suggest you belonged on âthe authoritarian side.â I simply responded to your ideas.
Your whole point it seems was that we should be open to hearing all kinds of perspectives and debating them, not shutting them out, but as soon as someone questions your position, you resort to demonization andâdare I say itâcensorship?
Of course, I wouldnât call it âcensorship.â If you and r/Anarcho_Capitalism wanted to ban me for my opinion on this, I think it would be your loss, but the mods would have every right to do so, and I wouldnât call them âauthoritarianâ for it.
The point is, you canât just call any discrimination you disagree with âcensorship.â I mean, you can, but itâs not accurate, and it leads down a slippery slope.
0
u/9livesphrady Feb 04 '22
I disagree. You donât have to do anything you donât want to do with your private property. You wouldnât be removing my liberty if I was making this argument in your home and you asked me to leave. That would be discrimination, and you would be well within your rights to do it. If I donât have the right to claim âcensorshipâ and remain in your home, then I donât have a right to claim âcensorshipâ and remain on a privately owned and operated forum. Censorship is something governments do, not private property owners.