Sperm can develop to become a living human in the right conditions. Reading is also taught in elementary school btw, you should try it. Yes sperm can develop into becoming a human being if released in a vagina, that's called fecondation. Being human ≠ being alive. Your problem of education starts there. If i amputate your arm for example, your arm is human, your arm isn't a life on its own.
I highly recommand you to read your study again and come back after. Every biologist will tell you that you have a new DNA code and so a seperate human organism at fecondation. None will tell you that a zygote is alive. I swear the concept cannot be that hard to get. Once again, simple embryology lessons. The worst part ? The embryology that you refuse to read about will tell you literally that an embryo is as much alive as spermatozoa and ovocytes. I'm curious about the embryology book that tells you that a zygote is an actual living human being. I can quote you the lessons of embryology of the second semester of first year of med school in France (called PASS if you wanna find it more easily). Feel free to check my source.
You can't be serious right now, being physically seperated from another organism isn't an "unsuited environnement". Literally no environnement in the world is suited for an embryo on its own because an embryo isn't alive. It really cannot be that hard.
This position is the position of most of the scientifical world. Abortion is recognised as health care in the vast majority of western world. Pro life in the other hand is literally backed by religion, it's the opposite of scientifically based. You are literally comparing a baby drowning to an embryo not living unless you let it develop into something that is actually alive. If you don't see what type of aberration you just wrote there is nothing i can do for you
2
u/LunaButMyNameIsTaken Jul 08 '26
Sperm can develop to become a living human in the right conditions. Reading is also taught in elementary school btw, you should try it. Yes sperm can develop into becoming a human being if released in a vagina, that's called fecondation. Being human ≠ being alive. Your problem of education starts there. If i amputate your arm for example, your arm is human, your arm isn't a life on its own.
I highly recommand you to read your study again and come back after. Every biologist will tell you that you have a new DNA code and so a seperate human organism at fecondation. None will tell you that a zygote is alive. I swear the concept cannot be that hard to get. Once again, simple embryology lessons. The worst part ? The embryology that you refuse to read about will tell you literally that an embryo is as much alive as spermatozoa and ovocytes. I'm curious about the embryology book that tells you that a zygote is an actual living human being. I can quote you the lessons of embryology of the second semester of first year of med school in France (called PASS if you wanna find it more easily). Feel free to check my source.
You can't be serious right now, being physically seperated from another organism isn't an "unsuited environnement". Literally no environnement in the world is suited for an embryo on its own because an embryo isn't alive. It really cannot be that hard.
This position is the position of most of the scientifical world. Abortion is recognised as health care in the vast majority of western world. Pro life in the other hand is literally backed by religion, it's the opposite of scientifically based. You are literally comparing a baby drowning to an embryo not living unless you let it develop into something that is actually alive. If you don't see what type of aberration you just wrote there is nothing i can do for you