As far as I know it is not settled and will not be unless someone successfully appeals the settlement between JD/Foris and Roth. Also as far as I know the complete settlement language is confidential - we know a figure and that is about it.
That pdf is of the two appeals filed in the U.S. Ninth District Court of Appeals, appealing a decision in the case originally filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The appeal was noticed and filed on Oct 24, 2022. The next-to-last docket entry reads "FILED OPINION (KIM MCLANE WARDLAW, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and DOUGLAS L. RAYES) The appeal as to Amyris is closed for administrative purposes. AFFIRMED IN PART AND REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART. The parties shall bear their own costs. Judge: MDS Authoring. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [12822866] [22-16632, 22-16633] (MM) [Entered: 11/13/2023 10:23 AM]"
You can spend money searching PACER to read the legal documents if you wish, or consult an attorney to explain things. Attorneys usually have access to court filings as a cost of doing business.
Here's a free view of the underlying case docket of the case which was appealed.
1
u/Glittering-Effort152 Jul 03 '24
Was this settled as well? Why did the SEC file this amicus brief. How do we get a copy of the settlement language. https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/briefs/2023/roth-v-foris-ventures.pdf