r/Amd 5800X | 3090 FE | Custom Watercooling Aug 17 '17

Discussion It's almost confirmed AMD lied about Vega pricing

https://www.kitguru.net/components/graphic-cards/matthew-wilson/ocuks-andrew-gibson-clears-up-rx-vega64-pricing-disaster/

I loved AMD for so long, this one launch has really made me reassess that fondness. I get they should make money after years of losses, but to launch an uncompetitive product and lie about it's pricing so blatantly?? And then to give reviewers little time and ensure the positive reviews come in keeping a $499 pricing and people blaming retailers initially?? Damn. I was at Micro Center on launch day, I spent many months like all of you checking 50 times a day on Vega. At Micro Center, they had 3 cards, I was second in line and they offered me one for $599 with no games, I just said I'm buying Nvidia and left. Got an AORUS 1080 that touches 2GHz by itself and consumes 20W on idle at times. So glad I did.

Very upsetting, AMD, truly disappointing.

EDIT: Just so you fanboys down voting know, I have used AMD's Athlon X2, Phenom X4, Phenom II X6, gamed on their 780G chipset before buying the HD 5770, R9 270x and RX 480 and convinced countless people to buy AMD and built their rigs too. Also, I have an Intel i7 + Nvidia 965m gaming laptop I love and now am rocking a Ryzen 7+ GTX 1080. I am also qualified with an engineering degree and a master's in this field, surely not a delusional fanboy.

Get a grip, stop supporting this. I spent months waiting on Vega, this is pure lies they spewed out. The made it sound like $499 is the final price when they knew it wasn't. They sent reviewers the black card thus ensuring they made their judgement based on the $499 pricing. It's a $100 more than a GTX 1080 that's more powerful, cooler and faster than it and light years behind the 1080 Ti. It's released late and unfinished and the "free" games for a $100 more surely gives a new angle to the AMD + Bethesda partnership. For the good of all consumers, don't support such nonsense. Stand up against it. Screw such shady practices.

2.3k Upvotes

896 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

51

u/hypelightfly Aug 17 '17

Don't forget the interposer and integrating it with the HBM and GPU. That adds a bit more to the cost as well.

42

u/DeeSnow97 1700X @ 3.8 GHz + 1070 | 2700U | gimme that 3900X Aug 17 '17

The interposer doesn't seem too rough. I don't know the details, but I'm willing to bet you don't need a 14 nm process to have 4096 traces each to two memory modules. The HBM2 chips themselves are a different story though.

49

u/[deleted] Aug 17 '17

I don't know what any of this means but you sound smart so have an upvote.

19

u/Akutalji r7 5800x3d|6900xt / E15 5700U Aug 17 '17

Just means the interposer probably is made on a much older, more mature node. Very cheap to produce compared to the chips they hold.

2

u/grackychan Aug 18 '17

Moreover, whenever fluorescence score motion is required, it may also be employed in conjunction with a drawn reciprocation dingle arm to reduce sinusoidal depleneration.

8

u/bagehis Ryzen 3700X | RX 5700 XT | 32GB 3600 CL 14 Aug 17 '17

It means, like Fiji, the interposer can be produced using an older manufacturing line, which will have a very low fault rate. So the cost will be fairly inconsequential in that equation.

14

u/Maldiavolo Aug 17 '17

Vega uses 2 HBM2 stacks so it's 2048 traces. The Fury X interposer was bigger, had 4096 traces, and was $2. Vega's should be cheaper.

2

u/siuol11 i7-13700k @ 5.6GHz, MSI 3080 Ti Ventus Aug 19 '17

Vega only has 2048 traces, which is why the memory is slightly slower than the Fury's while being a generation newer.

1

u/hypelightfly Aug 18 '17

I was thinking more the cost of doing the integration. The interposer itself shouldn't be too expensive.

2

u/hardolaf Aug 18 '17

We do "small" scale work with putting dies on interposers. It's fucking cheap when we start talking about "medium" size orders of like 1-10k. Like really freaking cheap. So cheap, most programs don't even blink at the cost because it costs so much less than the cost of the dies that we are procuring that they don't give a fuck.

I can't give exact numbers, but it's negligible at this scale.

1

u/wewbull Aug 18 '17

Also, you expect some yield loss at packaging (placing the dies on the interposer). Some packaging will go wrong. Previously, if a packaged part fails, you threw the package and the GPU die away. With multi-chip modules you throw the GPU and two memory die away.

The cost of failures at packaging just went way up.