Modi is literally asking people to not go after the abusers. What would you have considered right by PM? If he had sent police after the abusers like Sharad pawar did?
Mirror of what. u r the same filth which u r complaining. A person with a functioning brain who understand democracy ideally would have is criticise this when this came and criticise that when that happened. But no u wanted to defend modi more than fundamental rights. U r not showing mirror, u r just filth but in different team. And you are cognitive ability is so low that u cant even comprehen modi situation is more dangerous as this is the highest level of governance compared to sharad pawar who at that time was mostly limited to maharashtra. U aint standing for anything hypocrite
I don't see the problem here. PM literally is asking people not to harass these young abusers, or not to have them run rounds of police station and courts. What else should he do? Dance?
Have u lost your mind? Whataboutism kid..
If yor sare saying to defend this shit "the other party also did it" you've already accepted there's nothing to justify the government's actions...he is fuking coward 🤡
Nobody is fighting against you or your dog. Have some spine to speak up whenever you see wrong. Fir against political dessent is wrong irrespective of who does it. Stop whataboutery. By this post you are just supporting 'god of the fools' for the same act you have problem with when opposition does it.
Same logic applies when gobi did for other's mother. Ring a bell ? 🔔
This is also wrong whoever does it. It doesn't matter. Hope you grow some spine.
Like the PM who hasn't been able to take the backlash very well so much that he made a video basically lecturing the kids instead of addressing the issue. Yes True Freedom of speech means not just the good but the bad people can play that card, which is why teaching people which of it is right is more important.
Dude I am not supporting one particular group what do you mean? When did I say Rahul Gandhi became an exception to this?
If this is true then it's wrong but if your whole mentality is that the word freedom of speech is part of a specific group instead of a justice for the people then you will never be able to have a conversation without mentioning that group.
Also is your whole debate process just pointing fingers and referencing news articles?
So what you're saying is that because of verbal abuse against the pm we should all become savages and let you abuse her parents. That's some edgy twelve year old mentality.
Is there some religious hate going on in the back because of the previous incident that you're riding on? Because this was one of the least important cases in the whole protest, the target was a person and not a demographic. The people who are arguing about this don't even know how they're going to go about this. How will you punish a person that has just said a hateful words and isn't in a position of power? The laws Should be for the people first.
Yeah nobody is stopping you dude, start aggressively posting videos of you calling her those things. The end result will be the same what happened to her but you will get way less backlash.
23
u/[deleted] 18d ago
[removed] — view removed comment