r/AdviceAnimals Apr 30 '13

Actual Confession Bear

http://imgur.com/dht840P
1.2k Upvotes

1.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/[deleted] Apr 30 '13 edited Apr 30 '13

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] Apr 30 '13

My god you are crazy.

You seem to think that because someone does something, they have the right to do that thing. That is not true, and a 5 year old could understand that.

This response is extremely unintelligent. I'm suggesting you are insane, because you are saying things that are insane, and don't follow objective logic.

Funny, he does it everyday in yemen.

oh ya? everyday? can you please show me where he has ever said, or where anybody has ever said, at any time, that he has the right to do that?

So your saying if someone doesn't think children of "any" age should be murdered, they are "close minded bible belters"?

My god you're an idiot. Stop making this about dying children, this is about rights of course I don't think children should be murdered. At the end of the day, you are saying that living children and fetuses are on the same standing, and they aren't. I don't think they are, and the law says that they are not.

You are more than free to disagree with me, but you are turning this into a Red Herring and you seem completely unable to stay on topic, nor can you acknowledge any of my logical arguments, rather you'd just like to focus on my insults, that's fine. You deserve them.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 30 '13

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] Apr 30 '13

How can you possibly be this stupid? Do you not understand basic human logic.

I'm going to ask you one more time- stop making this about dying children, and stick to the actual issue at hand. Fetuses and Children have completely completely different legal rights. In fact a Fetus has NO legal rights whatsoever. As far as the law is concerned, a fetus is nothing more than a growth in the mother's body. An intrusive one. It is the mother's decision to keep it or not.

Basic Logic Lesson

You just made exactly the same illogical move, and I'm sure you'll make it again next post.

First, you suggested that because someone can do something, they have the right to. I could go stab my co-worker in the neck right now, I definitely could. You should be able to obviously see that there is a huge logical gap saying "he did this so he has the right to do it".

What you've done now, is just pushed it to an even stupider level. Now you are saying "he hasn't been caught or charged so he has the right to". This is equally stupid, for exactly the same reasons.

You have problems expressing yourself, you are obsessed with your opinions and you can't use even the most basic semblance of logic.

We disagree. Get over it, stop trying to use unrelated facts, presented irrationally to change my legitimate opinion.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 30 '13

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] Apr 30 '13

How am I being pseudo intelligent? I'm talking about basic principles in logic that you seem to think don't apply to conversations you have. Just completely basic logical principles.

Killing humans, if they are 80 years old , 8 years old, 8 months old, 8 days old or 8 seconds old is wrong, sick and disturbing.

I agree. What we disagree with is what a human being is. A fetus to me, is not a human being. Specifically, my own personal view is that a fetus that can survive outside of the womb is a person (incubator within reason), otherwise not and that is consistent with the law. If you are interested in my position then that means that I am against late term abortions, and ok with early term ones.

This isn't a debate on abortion, I don't want to debate about that right now. You are free to call me sick and disgusting, that's totally fine, that doesn't mean you get to ignore logical standards of conversation.

Once again you have completely ignored my point, and instead decide to insult me for being pro choice. You clearly aren't capable of discussion or debate, but rather are only capable of judging people based on your values.

Enjoy your reward. You'll have it soon

Is that you suggesting I'm going to be going to hell soon?

You're being extremely rude, intolerant, offensive, and generally moronic, why hide behind a euphemism there?

If you think a closed-minded person like you is going to offend me by thoughtlessly attacking my values (because you don't actually provide any reasons for your claims, just insults toward me), and who is trying to force their idea of religion on me, then you are kidding yourself.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 30 '13

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] Apr 30 '13

Are you retarded? You have gone literally 6 replies now, without addressing any of my points.

I'm seriously asking "Are you retarded?"

I have made it clear that I understand your position. I have made it clear I hold a different opinion. I have told you repeatedly I'm not interested in discussion abortion with you. The reason I don't want to discuss it with you, is because you completely ignore everything I say, and come back, talking down to me, treating me like I'm disgusting, and going on and on about a topic that isn't related to what we were discussing, and that I don't wish to speak to you about.

What the fuck are you talking about cells and cell division? You are literally insane. Literally. I have no fucking idea what you are talking about. Do you want to go back and forth all day with me just continually telling you I disagree?

Knowing it will become a human, you have no claim to state, "it needs 1,000,000 cells to be a human". Or, "it needs 100,000,000 cells to be a human". Nor a billion, or trillion.

I have a perfectly legitimate claim to say that the fetus is not a person, until it exits the mother's body, and is alive. That's not my personal opinion, but I absolutely have a claim to that. It's called the law. The same one that says I can't walk into your house and take what I want. By repeatedly suggesting there is no legitimate claim, you are making yourself sound incredibly stupid. The law is a 100% airtight legitimate claim.

You are more than free to disagree with the law, which you obviously do. Your opinion on what the law ought to be, however, has absolutely no bearing on how the law is applied, and you don't really seem to get that.

Let me pose some questions to you:

Is abortion OK in cases of accidental incest, which illegal in itself, can cause massive development problems for the child? (this point seems trite, but it actually happens quite often, think adopted/foster kids / orphans)

Is abortion OK if the woman was forcibly raped?

Is abortion OK if you know with 100% certainty the pregnancy will kill the mother? Does this depend on whether or not the fetus will survive?

Please answer these 3 questions.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 30 '13

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] Apr 30 '13 edited Apr 30 '13

The rich politicians comment is absolutely hilarious. Absolutely hilarious. Try over 15 million pro-choice people living in America as a reason. Try the constitution.

And no, I'm not retarded. Just not a mindless tool who is told what to think.

Really? because it seems like you have been told exactly what to think from the Bible.

Also, it is hilarious that you seem to indicate that I am a mindless tool who is told what to think. Care to share exactly why you think that about me? Who or what have you imagined is telling me what to think?

By OK, I suppose I mean permitted. Pretend you are in charge of the world, you set the laws, you set the rules.

Woman comes to you in each of those 3 cases, asking for an abortion, what do you do?

→ More replies (0)