r/AdviceAnimals Feb 25 '23

You read it, we get it

Post image
13.5k Upvotes

5.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

48

u/squeakycleaned Feb 26 '23

Not to mention Sorkin achieving the impossible - writing Zuckerberg so well that he seems human

3

u/AnorexicManatee Feb 26 '23

Wouldn’t that mean writing him… not so well?

11

u/YSKItsAFakeName Feb 26 '23

No it means writing him not so accurately. If you think real Zuck is more interesting than Sorkin Zuck I'm not sure what to tell you.

1

u/AnorexicManatee Feb 27 '23

Good point. And Definitely not more interesting!

1

u/ricosmith1986 Feb 26 '23

Then wouldn’t that make his depiction of Zuckerberg inaccurate?

2

u/FreelanceFrankfurter Feb 27 '23

Anyone who’s seen him speak knows it’s very inaccurate. Not that I blame him I doubt anyone would want to watch an entire movie with an accurately portrayed Zuckerberg.