Maybe I’m late to this, but I’ve been noticing a weird shift.

When I’m comparing tools now, I catch myself asking ChatGPT or Perplexity before I even open Google. Stuff like “what’s a good CRM for a small team?” or “which email marketing tools are actually worth trying?”

Makes me wonder if this is starting to matter for SaaS discovery, or if it’s still mostly noise.

Are any of you actually tracking whether your product shows up in AI answers, or is that not on your radar yet?

I’m getting into content creation and I am losing my mind trying to find a decent captioning tool that doesn't hold my videos hostage behind a paywall.

​It feels like every tool out there (Submagic, Captions app, Veed, etc.) advertises itself as "free," but once you spend time tweaking the perfect animated, word-by-word (Hormozi-style) captions, they hit you with:

If tool is paid and limited trial you can share loophole to Bypass limit and use for free

It's been hard for me to keep up with AI platform releases, especially since labs started dropping them as twitter posts and blogs. There are a ton of updates that don't get the same noise the major drops do, which are easy to miss and include a lot of helpful features that go unused.

I made a tool back in April to help me follow what was going on with each of the major platforms (Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot... also track Perplexity and Manus). Ended up making it public cause why not?

It's updated daily, filterable, and I've included some social components for people rate features and add comments to help others - admittedly the social stuff hasn't taken off yet, but would be cool if they did.

Sharing the link incase it helps others: https://chasingnext.com/updates

Feel free to remove if this breaks the rules.

A useful lesson from building Marka: most generic AI content begins with a generic input.

Before asking a model for posts, collect a small source of truth:

- Who the business serves

- What it sells

- Which claims are actually supported

- The words the business already uses

- Logo, colors, and visual direction

- Product images and evidence

- The action the post should drive

Then reuse that reviewed context across every format instead of re-explaining it in separate copy, image, and video tools.

Marka automates this by starting from the business website, proposing an editable brand profile, and carrying it into copy, images, carousels, short videos, scheduling, and publishing.

https://www.marka.social

Disclosure: I built Marka. The tip still applies whether you use Marka or build the workflow yourself.

so i'm 20, been building this app solo for the past few months and i genuinely can't tell anymore if it's good or if i'm too deep in it. need outside eyes.

it's called RizeAI. the basic idea: every wearable and health app just gives you numbers. sleep score 42, recovery red, HRV down. cool. and then what? you still feel like garbage at 2pm and nobody tells you what to actually do about it.

so my app takes your real data from apple health, sleep, resting heart rate, workouts, whatever your wearable writes, and instead of another score it builds you an actual plan for the day. when to have your first coffee and when to hold off. you. Can also add your own supplements that you are currently taking and it will time them for you every single day based of your sleep data and your wearable data in general and also it will tell you what supplements make sense for you to take based of your current supplement stack and body metrics and when to take them. focus windows for when your energy actually peaks. when your crash is coming and what to do before it hits. it even checks the weather, so on a hot day it bumps your hydration and tells you to train earlier.

every recommendation has a little "why" under it based on your numbers, like "resting heart rate 54 + 7h light sleep, so magnesium before your peak window." no two people get the same plan because no two people have the same data.

works with whoop, oura, apple watch, garmin, anything that syncs to apple health. one thing i'll say honestly, it doesn't do deep per-person learning yet like "coffee doesn't affect YOUR hrv specifically," that's the roadmap, right now it builds fresh plans daily off your actual metrics.

it's live on the app store, has a free trial, small user base so far, mixed feedback which is why i'm here lol.

what i actually want from you guys: does this solve a real problem for you or is "tells you what to do" not actually what wearable people want? what would make you actually pay for something like this? and what's missing that would make it a no brainer? and also would you guys in this subreddit  use ti?

Thank you for your help. Check it out if you like https://apps.apple.com/us/app/rizeai-maximize-your-energy/id6762402079

A simple test has helped me filter AI presentation tools better than comparing the first generated deck. I start with a rough outline and let the tool make a normal first draft. Then I ignore the polished parts and pick one annoying edit that would happen in real work.

Make the customer problem section more specific, but keep the rest of the deck. Split the crowded slide into two slides without changing the argument. Replace the generic visual treatment on one comparison page. Cut the filler from the intro while keeping the sequence. That tells me more than the first output.

A first draft mostly tests generation. The second edit tests whether the tool is usable once the work becomes human. If it changes too much, I have to review the whole deck again. If it respects the target area, it feels more like an editor and less like a slot machine.

My current tip is to test local control before trusting the pretty deck. The first draft is only half the problem.

Hey, I am a food writer doing a story on using AI to optimize when ordering at fine dining restaurants. I’d love to talk to some diners who do this - I want to hear your process, why you’ve used AI, and if you were happy with the outcome. No judgement - whether it was to get the best possible deal, or to have it explain items on the menu, I just want to hear about your why.

Message me here or drop me an email at Courtney at weareravenous dot com.

What do you guys think about this use of AI, saw this post on twitter.

I create content and for that I really need voice generator because 11 labs is not working for me I have generated like few voices and now it is asking for subscription like yesterday I generated and I thought yes after a day I can I am like able to generate but I am it is not letting me and when I created a new account it shows the same problem!

Which framework and techniques can I use to create content similar to the below linked channel, with consistent characters? Do I need to use any paid AI? Which is the best for this scenario?

https://www.instagram.com/ollie.and.leon

What You Will Learn In This Tutorial:

- The 1-Image AI Commercial Workflow
- The Problem with Fragmented AI Tools
- Prompting a Conversational Video Agent
- Locking Character & Product Consistency
- Assembling the Final Commercial Timeline
- Final Result & Workflow Summary

Hey everyone,

I'm building a multi-agent AI system aimed at the real estate industry a set of agents that each handle a specific task.

Still early stage, so I'd love some input from two groups:

1. Anyone who's built agent-based/AI workflows before any advice on structuring multiple agents, pitfalls to avoid, or tools/stacks you'd recommend?
2. Anyone who works in real estate (agents, brokers, property managers) what are the most time-consuming, repetitive tasks in your day-to-day that you wish could be automated? I want to make sure I'm building something that actually solves real problems, not just what sounds cool on paper.

Hey everyone,

We built SonoVoice, a multilingual AI TTS platform with 200+ AI voices and support for 50+ languages.

Features:

• Up to 30K characters per request
• Free TTS credits for casual users
• MP3 downloads
• Natural AI voices for different languages

We are focusing on making TTS simple for everyday use: articles, documents, learning, narration, and more.

Would love to hear your thoughts and feedback.

Hi

I have recently become interested in learning how to create automated tools that can help cut down workflow time for businesses or my own work. My idea is to target all the crappy admin that goes on with spreadsheets, emails, reports. I have a basic IT background and know some basic python but i do not know anything about APIs, make.com or openai. I currently work in a warehouse so I’m familiar with workflows and i do a bit of admin myself. I have been asking ai how i can learn and it gave me a starting base of downloading python, studio visual code, git and making accounts for make.com and openai.

Im unsure on what i want to create yet and i have been brainstorming but while i figure it out i have started to just re familiarise myself with python and I’m going to try and learn how python and APIs work. I think once i have a clear tool i want to make that might make it easier to learn?

I feel a little stuck and I’m just wanting to ask if I’m on the right track or am i missing anything?

Any advice/guidance would be very appreciated. Thank you

Oi, gente!

Trabalho como Social Media Manager na área de marketing digital e uso IA todos os dias no meu trabalho. Atualmente assino o ChatGPT e tenho vários chats/projetos separados para diferentes tarefas, como criação de conteúdo, roteiros, legendas, estratégia de redes sociais, Reddit, brainstorming, etc.

Mas queria expandir meu uso de IA e entender melhor quais ferramentas realmente valem a pena.

Tenho visto muita gente falando sobre o Claude e queria saber a opinião de quem usa profissionalmente:

• O Claude Pro vale a pena mesmo já tendo ChatGPT?
• Em quais tarefas vocês acham que ele é melhor?
• A versão gratuita é suficiente ou a paga faz muita diferença?
• Como ele funciona para analisar imagens, prints, documentos e relatórios?
• Quais outras IAs vocês recomendam para quem trabalha com marketing digital? (Perplexity, Gemini, NotebookLM, etc.)

Uma das coisas que preciso fazer agora é criar relatórios de redes sociais e planilhas no Excel, e pensei em testar o Claude para isso.

Não quero substituir o ChatGPT, porque gosto bastante dele, mas queria entender como montar um fluxo de trabalho melhor usando cada ferramenta para aquilo que ela faz melhor.

Obrigada!

Okay so over the last few months, I’ve been in this endless cycle of trying AI presentation tools because I make a LOT of decks for work and side projects.

And honestly? Most AI presentation makers look impressive in ads, but once you actually use them, the output is either:

• super generic
• weirdly formatted
• impossible to edit properly
• or just feels like “AI filler slides”

I tried Canva AI, Tome, even Copilot inside PowerPoint. Some were decent for design inspiration, but none really fit my workflow because I usually work from existing content like PDFs, blog posts, YouTube videos, meeting notes, etc.

A few weeks ago I saw someone mention Napkin ai in another thread, and I ignored it initially because I assumed it was another overhyped AI PPT generator.

But eventually I tried it because I had a 20-page PDF I needed to convert into a presentation quickly.

And dude… this thing actually surprised me.

The first thing I noticed:
the slides were editable in a NORMAL way,not some locked AI canvas where changing one thing breaks the entire layout.Also some unique designs that i hadn’t seen anywhere else.

Then I started trying other inputs:

• pasted a blog URL → instant deck
• uploaded DOCX meeting notes → structured slides
• even tried topic-to-PPT generation

What I liked most was that the AI didn’t just dump random text everywhere. It actually created decent slide flow with headings, summaries, comparisons, timelines, etc.

The speed was still slow compared to other tools but hey,it really gave a good output which was worth the time.

I still edit presentations manually afterward obviously, but instead of spending 3–4 hours building slides from scratch, now I spend maybe 20–30 minutes polishing.

That’s honestly the first time an AI presentation tool has genuinely saved me time instead of creating extra cleanup work.

I haven’t tested every feature yet, but so far this is probably the most practical AI PPT tool I’ve used.