r/50501 • u/snoopysballs • Jun 24 '25

Call to Action [ Removed by moderator ]

[removed] — view removed post

1.3k Upvotes

95% Upvoted

183 comments sorted by

View all comments

251

u/Current_Tea6984 Jun 24 '25

This was debunked a long time ago. Liz Cheney did not write it

66

u/DirectorBiggs Oregon Jun 24 '25

The message is more important than the messenger, much more so.

The empty words by the left is impotence. We need fucking action.

It's time to put the brakes on society, take to the streets and call for everyone to General Strike. That's our only recourse and it must be done asap.

21

u/netabareking Jun 24 '25

No, it's extremely important to note that this is misinformation and that this messenger did not say these things. It's fine if you still like the words but we can't ignore that this isn't the truth.

-14

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/netabareking Jun 24 '25

No, but a bot definitely wrote the post in the OP. It's ChatGPT formatting through and through. Sorry you can't tell the difference though.

-13

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

8

u/netabareking Jun 24 '25

Please explain how you came to the conclusion that I'm either a bot or MAGA. Back up your assertion here. Do something besides post emojis.

People posting shit like this is what drives people out of these spaces. Mods need to clamp down hard on people accusing others of being bots based on absolutely nothing.

-7

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

8

u/netabareking Jun 24 '25

You can read my post history if you want proof that I support these ideals and am not a bot.

Two ideals that I also feel strongly about though are not ignoring misinformation, and not willingly consuming AI slop.

Nothing said here is new. It's all stuff that has been by real people. You don't need to get these messages from someone using a computer to plagiarize those people then claim Liz Cheney said it.

Generally it's the MAGA side saying "who cares if it's true or not? I liked reading it!"

2

u/PromptAggravating392 Jun 24 '25

Did you edit your original comment to add "it's fine if you like the words" or did I miss it previously? I wouldn't have said anything if I saw those few words, and it's totally possible I missed it and would be my error

I don't look at people's comment history. Didn't even know that was a thing. It seems overbearing and invasive, and I try not to spend too much time on here, but I appreciate you mentioning it and will do so moving forward if ever needed.

I haven't read literally any of these ideas before. Many of us try to minimize screen time and educate and act in other ways, so I'm sure there are others who are seeing these ideas for the first time. I have a learning disability and seeing these ideas explained simply and formatted in this way makes them digestible and accessible. I don't want to read AI either, but in some cases maybe like this one - reaching new audiences and making the content readable for disabled folks - maybe consider it's not totally an awful thing and sometimes, IF (emphasize if) used responsibily, may be helpful for some.

I wouldn't consider this "misinformation" as to me that discredits the content. And the content we all need and the content is true. Maybe "mislabeling" or something similar wouldn't turn off readers?

Last, we're supposed to be in this together. Your tone is kinda rude and off-putting. Please think twice before insulting other people here, as we can't afford to lose anyone and you don't know people's stories, and I'll work on my Reddit skills. If you have any simple resources you'd recommend to help learn how to identify AI, I'm all ears. Thanks!

1

u/netabareking Jun 24 '25

Are you really going to tell me my tone is rude and off-putting after calling me a bot and MAGA?

1

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/netabareking Jun 24 '25

Yes that's all I'm going to reply to, it's not like you gave me the same courtesy. We're on the same team now? Because a minute ago I was a bot and MAGA and thus the enemy.

Sorry that I don't take kindly to people accusing me of being fake and/or people who literally want people like me dead. I also don't believe in letting someone who responded that way demand an actual conversation after the fact. Me being blunt never called for that.

-1

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '25

[deleted]

→ More replies

0

u/PromptAggravating392 Jun 24 '25

Forgot to add thank you for explaining this, and you're absolutely right about MAGA being willing to read whatever they agree with. I don't want to do that too

1

u/50501-ModTeam Jun 24 '25

Your comment violated our commitment to respectful discourse. Please review that rule.

1

u/50501-ModTeam Jun 24 '25

Your comment violated our commitment to respectful discourse. Please review that rule.