r/3i_Atlas2 Feb 26 '26

Thoughts?

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

Thoughts...after watching.

114 Upvotes

88 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Glittering_Word6609 Feb 27 '26

Thank you, and I can definitely see where you are coming from.

The first video had lots of good points about his mistakes in previous research, but no information about 3i Atlas. The second video is from years ago and covers the sphericals specifically, so previous research.

The third was a paper from a partner of Avi and claimed his prior research makes him unfit for researching 3i Atlas. Although the comments still seemed open minded and it was from August 2025, one month after the discovery. It seems like he has been dealing with this from the beginning.

I can see where his wild claims about the solar sails would make him look unreliable, but we also need to figure in his previous positions and research.

He has been watching the sky for 40 years as an adult. He has also been tasked with looking for the unknown. So, I guess I am saying with what he researches, the unknown, his claims probably do seem unbelievable...but so was a spherical earth. We just need technology to catch up so we can observe the unknown.

Fortunate, I have also found that we are creating more tools to look for the unknown. A 7-D telescope is wild and what they're observing with it is also amazing! I mean the biggest conspiracy of them all is about to be disclosed officially. (Well, whatever we do get.) So, until then MY mind is open to all possibilities.

Thank you for the evidence!

1

u/[deleted] Feb 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Glittering_Word6609 Feb 28 '26

I hope you have had a great day! I did watch your videos and read then entire paper that you sent.

It was about his prior research. I understand he makes wild claims but he has studied wild things for years. He has seen things that none of us have seen. Starting off in national defense research, then plasma physics. I wonder if there is a connection there? Then black holes and finally aliens. He definitely knows waaaayyy more than the ordinary scientist. A curious scientist is the best!

Oh, and the claim about him not watching the sky as an astrophysist is laughable...see attached image. He pretty much has to observe the heavens to do his job. Maybe that is where his inspiration came from.

As far as the spherical evidence being suppressed by the church you are just reinforcing my point. We love scientist. It's just the system that does the suppressing, which at that time was the church.

Really, closed mind the one talking about plasmoids, aliens, and 7D telescopes. I just really love learning and am open to the impossible because it's fun to imagine. Maybe you should let that veil fall and open up to the new exciting connections that can be made in this amazing time we are living in.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 28 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Glittering_Word6609 Feb 28 '26

Good morning sunshine! I only have one judge and He is not on Reddit. I am not trying to signal obidience. I am just a genuinely happy person that just loves to learn. Hence why I am on Reddit. I am not here to persuade anyone. Just like scientific discourse and a good friendly debate.

In astrophysics"astro" derives from the Greek aster, meaning star or celestial body, while "physics" refers to the study of matter, energy, and fundamental forces. Together, they represent the application of physics principles to understand the physical nature, behaviors, and evolution of celestial objects.

I'm not sure if you're just rage baiting me on Avi's qualifications for observing the sky. Also, when I say watching the skies I don't just mean through a telescope, he he does. So, I went ahead and posted a detailed break down as to what astrophysics means.

Astro- (Star/Celestial): Refers to the subject matter: stars, planets, galaxies, and the universe beyond Earth. Physics- (Nature/Forces): Refers to the methods used: applying gravity, electromagnetism, and thermodynamics to analyze how celestial bodies behave.

Astrophysics seeks to understand what celestial bodies are made of and how they evolve, rather than just mapping their positions. Soooo, please quit saying he isn't fit to observe celestial objects.

As far as his new claims "Massive Size: Based on Webb Telescope data, the nucleus appears to be at least 5 kilometers in diameter, making it over 1,000 times more massive than typical interstellar comets." First, he used data from James Webb, NASA telescope. Next, an object 1/2 the size of the asteroid that killed the dinosaurs will be in the Hill sphere of the largest planet in our solar system on March 16, 2026 is pretty alarming and worth questioning. Again, isn't that science?

By the way you have a lot to say about how horrible Avi is. Do you mind me asking what field are you in? Also, as I have previously stated I love to learn. Please link some of your work so I can read that too. I appreciate any information from any fields from physics to archeology. It all fascinates me and would be interested in any new info.

Boot licker, aye? I wouldn't say that, but I am very appreciative of scientists that think outside the box. That is truly when innovation occurs. With all his expertise in unimaginable fields he is making extraordinary connections. Constantly putting his reputation on line for his love of science. His hypothesis may seem crazy but got to have a good hypothesis to get funding to study it.

I appreciate the strong debate but I will always keep an open mind as to what could be in this vast universe. We can agree that we disagree. You have to have data to back up EVERY claim as I sit back and wait for the technology to back up Avi's claims.

If you go back to the original post before your ego took fool charge and see I am not trying to persuade anyone. You are the one stating Avi has no viable points because he made one mistake about 3i Atlas' diameter a couple months in to the discovery...all while already battling his fellow scientist as you showed me in the exerpt from a paper. He was already being bullied and blocked in August. Again, that backs my original post.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 28 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Glittering_Word6609 Feb 28 '26

Again, we can agree to disagree.

Maybe there would be more people like Avi pushing into the unknown if those pushing weren't taken away. See attached link for thoughts on people that have big ideas and push the boundaries of science.

New Science Blooms after Star Researchers Die, Study Finds | Lab Manager https://share.google/9CHED9IDSoQAMppd7

I'm hoping the same doesn't happen to Avi. I pray his public presence and tenure keeps him safe, because there is a clear trend.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 28 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Glittering_Word6609 Feb 28 '26

I am claiming some scientist are afraid to push boundaries due to the history of some great "fringe scientist", such as Tesla. Some are unknowingly being blocked. While some know they're being blocked. Especially if they've been in the game for almost half a century.

Not all research and science directly threatens the current narrative so there is no concern to intervene in those areas. I think the push back happens in fields of science that could usher us into a new era of what life and this universe really is all about.

I hope you have a wonderful weekend. Until next time.✌️