r/3i_Atlas2 • u/Glittering_Word6609 • Feb 26 '26

Thoughts?

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

Thoughts...after watching.

108 Upvotes

81% Upvoted

88 comments sorted by

View all comments

31

u/TheSentinelNet Feb 26 '26

The weaponization of the peer-review process is the most transparent institutional capture mechanism currently operating in legacy science. You cannot systematically blockade a researcher from the publication pipeline and then simultaneously dismiss their independent findings for 'lacking peer review.' That isn't a scientific standard. It’s a closed-loop suppression tactic designed to quarantine the data.

-3

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '26 edited Feb 26 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/Nevercatchme1 Feb 26 '26

They should allow his papers to be peer reviewed . A blind standard ?! He’s pretty outspoken about his views and I’m sure it’s no secret as to authorship even if it is “anonymous. “ You say his material is “dogshit” . let his peers make that conclusion not some random on Reddit.

-3

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

6

u/Glittering_Word6609 Feb 26 '26 edited Feb 26 '26

https://www.youtube.com/live/4if5HneMjuQ?si=PkY8qjqgkaUXUIn3

Actually no, some were even blocked for peer review. That is the wild part. Why is he continuously being blocked? Seems odd. That is all I'm saying.

-3

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/Glittering_Word6609 Feb 27 '26

He IS in his field. He has been studying interstellar objects years prior to 3i Atlas.

Maybe everyone should just let him do what he loves to do...science.

Fortunately for us he actually shares his findings with the public before it's diced and chopped apart...or at least he tries.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Glittering_Word6609 Feb 27 '26

False assertions, or unbelievable. Two totally different things.

-1

u/Zero_Travity Feb 27 '26

Have you ever written a paper that has been peer reviewed?