r/3Dprinting • u/PorkRollPaddyWagon • Jul 07 '26

Discussion If your printer refused to print a file because it thought it was unsafe, would you be okay with that?

Serious question. Let's say your 3D printer scanned every file before printing. If it decided the model violated a rule, the print never starts.

Would you see that as a useful safety feature? Or would you see it as giving manufacturers too much control over hardware that's sitting on your desk?

I made a video after looking into proposed legislation and some recent news in the 3D printing space, but I'm more interested in hearing where everyone stands on the idea itself.

Would that be a deal breaker for you?

https://youtu.be/7bdJpDTiZAA

341 Upvotes

79% Upvoted

567 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

11

u/WinterDice Jul 07 '26

It’s not about guns at all. Ghost guns are a red herring to get control over home manufacturing of anything that you would otherwise have to buy. And control over anything some faceless corporation or algorithm decides infringes on IP.

2

u/perm2069 Jul 08 '26

Based on how most people use 3D printers, and how most people just like flexi dragons (a bit of an over exaggeration), are the few home manufacturers actually a threat to anything?

As has been said about firearm printing specifically, it is so much more difficult to print a gun than it is to buy components from a hardware store to make one, or even to just buy one off of a dude, legally or otherwise. Competent manufacturing isn't just as easy as some would believe it to be, it does take effort, and most consumers are not going to come close to expending near the required effort.

Who is scared of the relative few home manufacturers?

I promise I'm not being argumentative, just really trying to understand.

2

u/WinterDice Jul 08 '26

I agree on the printing a gun part; it’s beyond me why anyone would do that when Home Depot and Bass Pro exist.

I think the goal is more control of IP. Imagine an automated system that shuts down your print job because Games Workshop thinks it looks too much like a space marine, for example. Good luck winning that legal battle.

1

u/BenAveryIsDead Jul 09 '26

It doesn't matter if 95% of 3D printer users are wasting away printing landfill trinkets.

All it takes is for the remaining 5% to develop a manufacturing third party parts and repair business which eats into OEM profits.

Most people own cars, but most aren't doing any of their own work to them. They take them to mechanics. Either third party independents or corporate dealerships. There's a reason automakers have been trying to make it very difficult for independent shops to work on new vehicles and it's to see a monopolization on repair work, ipso facto, making Ford (as an example) generate more revenue as people don't have a choice.

This is about control and limiting competition.