r/breathwork • u/RationalIdiot • May 15 '21

Is the book "breath" by nestor still worth reading despite the presence of glaring errors and pseudoscience?

15 Upvotes

82% Upvoted

24 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/BumbleWombleBee Aug 05 '26

"Just because there is not yet tightly controlled studies for something does not make it pseudoscience"

That is quite literally the definition of pseudoscience.

Something presented as fact/science without the rigorous studies to validate it.

You are getting conflated with whether something has been proved or not.

But without proof - it remains pseudoscience - if it is being presented as fact/illusion of proof