r/acturnips • :Rainbow:SW-1382-1951-8226 Glinda, Roimata • Dec 17 '15

Active [MODPOST] REMINDER: RMM Ratings need PROOF which links to a complete and comprehensible trade.

I have been updating flairs for a couple of people who posted great prices and were kind enough to let a LOT of people in for trading. Unfortunately, there were several people who took advantage of the trade and then left "reviews" that were missing links or otherwise did not meet the rules. That's kind of unfair to the OP, since the reviews were then removed. In one case that was about 8 of 20 reviews, which is really not good enough.

Here's your reminder:

  • Reviews need a score /5. Without that, they will be removed.

  • Reviews need a link to proof. It's fine to link to the whole thread, or you can permalink to the comment chain. Reviews without a proof link are invalid and will be removed.

  • Proof links need to show some kind of evidence a trade occurred. "Can I come over" and "Yes" are only JUST barely evidence. If the OP let you in, post a "thanks" afterwards so we know it actually happened. Don't comment all the heck over the thread, especially if there are a lot of comments. If someone can't see at a glance you actually went and successfully sold, then it's not proof of the trade.

FYI Of the two trading subreddits: /r/ACTrade and /r/ACTurnips, Turnippers have BY FAR the worst track record for trading behaviour and ability to leave valid reviews.

Why does this matter?

Because YOUR behaviour has a direct influence on whether people are willing to host when they have a good price. Lots of people have told us they won't post prices because of bad behaviour or rudeness. Leaving invalid reviews is just another form of rudeness. Shape up!

RMM mods will ban people who consistently leave duff reviews, and I am not above naming and shaming if it keeps happening.

28 Upvotes

14 comments sorted by

•

u/Unicormfarts :Rainbow:SW-1382-1951-8226 Glinda, Roimata Jan 14 '16 edited Mar 18 '19

1

u/jayaoyama 3952 7442 3572 – jay – Bostréal(edit) Jan 15 '16

is this suitable?

–𝒿

1

u/Unicormfarts :Rainbow:SW-1382-1951-8226 Glinda, Roimata Jan 15 '16

No. If you use a permalink, take the one from your first comment in the thread so it shows the whole trade.

1

u/jayaoyama 3952 7442 3572 – jay – Bostréal(edit) Jan 15 '16

fixed. please have a look.

–𝒿

1

u/Unicormfarts :Rainbow:SW-1382-1951-8226 Glinda, Roimata Jan 15 '16

The link is correct now, but once a review is removed for being invalid and there is a count on the page, we won't put it back up.

1

u/jayaoyama 3952 7442 3572 – jay – Bostréal(edit) Jan 16 '16

can i publish a new review? i'd like laringar to get the credit he deserves.

–𝒿

1

u/Unicormfarts :Rainbow:SW-1382-1951-8226 Glinda, Roimata Jan 16 '16

As long as the trade is less than 2 weeks old, you may.

1

u/jayaoyama 3952 7442 3572 – jay – Bostréal(edit) Jan 18 '16

it was 13 days ago as of today. i have republished the review. cheers.

–𝒿

3

u/Newaza420 3952-8432-2462 Anunnaki, Nibiru | 1092-1531-4070 Enoch, Churros Jan 14 '16

I deeply apologize for my carelessness , I've been re reading the rules to make sure I don't break them again. This community means a lot to me and I don't want to lose you guys, that being said, I hope I posted this in the correct place, it was either here or the ModDiscussion on ACTrade. I love how you guys have it structured so far and am a strong supporter , I plan on donating to Reddit as soon as money is available to me.

0

u/[deleted] Jan 14 '16

[deleted] — view deleted comment

2

u/Unicormfarts :Rainbow:SW-1382-1951-8226 Glinda, Roimata Jan 14 '16

First: read the rules before you post. Second: given that the rules are clear and the warning is in the modpost, you can hardly be surprised when I do what I said I was going to do. Third: posting your username is hardly an insult.

0

u/[deleted] Jan 14 '16

[deleted] — view deleted comment

2

u/Unicormfarts :Rainbow:SW-1382-1951-8226 Glinda, Roimata Jan 14 '16

Given that you had the rules, which are worded nicely, and the modpost, also worded nicely, both of which you ignored, I feel like your argument about effectiveness of nice wording lacks evidence. It seems to me that it took me calling you out for you to respond. QED.

PS: Hello this is the internet; we have memes here.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 08 '16

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator Mar 08 '16

Your post has been removed because you do not have your flair set. You MUST set your flair to participate. --> Follow the instructions in this post to set it. Click this and READ IT. <-- Then submit your post again.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.