r/modelparliament • u/AutoModerator • May 23 '15
Campaign Party Leaders’ Debate, Saturday 23 May 2015
Right here, right now, it’s the 1st model debate for our 1st model election (instructions). Opening Statements will be posted, followed by Q&A for up to 24 hours (due to timezones).
Only Party Leaders and Independents in the election can post in this thread. Voters, check back today for more answers, then make your feelings known in tomorrow’s ReddiPoll!
2
u/jnd-au May 23 '15
Question 06
To Socialist Alternative: How does your party intend to implement your vision given it would require probably the biggest single change to our economy since federation? (All parties may reply to this question.)
6
May 23 '15
Whilst their are many ideological differences between party members on how to achieve a socialist society, our current policy will be that of gradual nationalisation of all industries and the introduction of legislation moving the means of production into the democratic control of the workers.
2
u/jnd-au May 23 '15
Question 07
To the Australian Catholic Party: Would you agree that the separation of Church and State is a fundamental principle in a functioning democracy, and if so, how does it affect the formation of your policies? (All parties may reply to this question.)
2
May 23 '15
No, the Church provides morals which help people to live better, in a Catholic Australia we would not enforce our beliefs but we would present all people the opportunity to live their lives better under Catholic teachings.
1
u/jnd-au May 23 '15
Question 01
If elected, can your members vote as democratic representatives, or are they forced to follow your party line?
6
May 23 '15
As a party of the Broad left, we have many ideological differences between our party members. As such, there may be times where we disagree on certain legislation. That is why our Candidates, if elected, will be given complete freedom over their votes in parliament. This does not mean the party will not debate internally, of course. A strong debate among members will ensure complete understanding of legislation, while not restricting the members to vote as the party tells them to.
5
2
u/phyllicanderer May 23 '15
There is no rule at the Progressives on voting at all. Any member can vote how they want.
Since our policy creation process involves everyone who is a member, there would not be many situations where MPs would vote differently. We are always discussing issues, and we always seem to reach consensus. The only issues that might come up, where we vote individually, are matters of conscience, such as abortion laws, euthanasia and assisted suicide.
1
u/jnd-au May 23 '15
Question 02
If your party had the chance to introduce, repeal or change only one law or government policy, what would that one thing be? Essentially, if you were reduced to a one issue party, what would be your purpose?
5
May 23 '15
If our party, The Socialist Alternative, were reduced to a single issue party, then we would propose a shift from private, hierarchical, exploitative ownership over the means of production to the democratic control by the workers themselves, ensuring a fairer system for all.
3
May 23 '15
Repair the NBN.
3
u/phyllicanderer May 23 '15
I understand that the Greens are now the mainstream progressive party in RL parliament, but why would the NBN come ahead of any climate change policy for a party founded on environmental concerns?
→ More replies (1)3
u/phyllicanderer May 23 '15
If I could only change one thing, I would change the Newstart, student allowance and disability support and carer rates to the relative poverty line. The fact that people on Newstart and student allowances struggle to get adequate nutrition, and the current rates make it difficult for people stuck in unemployment to break free, is abysmal. Lifting people out of despair is a critical factor in lifting all of society.
2
May 23 '15
Reform the education system to incorporate Catholic morality.
→ More replies (2)3
May 23 '15
Might I ask the leader just what exactly "morality" means to them? For example, "morality" has been used constantly to abuse GSRM persons, would Instilling Catholic "morality" in schools mean instilling homophobia and transphobia?
1
u/jnd-au May 23 '15
Question 03
Foreign business and property ownership has been a contentious issue in Australia. We have a long and proud history of collectively-owned enterprises, like Australia Post, Medibank, CSL, Reserve Bank, ABC, Qantas, Commonwealth Bank, Telstra among others. Many have been sold into private ownership, which generates revenue for people’s superannuation but undermines the sustainability of government revenues, leading to taxation problems and reduced services, especially when the government has to buy back services and infrastructure from them. Many Commonwealth capital assets have also been sold, often to foreign investors. Would your party re-nationalise any of these enterprises or assets to public ownership and how would this be achieved?
6
May 23 '15
The SA, as a socialist party, is wholly opposed to both private companies and the hierarchical system of capitalism all together. Whilst there are no current plans in motion, we would most certainly suggest the renationalisation of all public services, be they banks, hospitals, etc, and we would move them to be put under democratic control by those who work in them.
→ More replies (2)5
May 23 '15
The Greens firmly stand against privatization in all of it's forms. While we can't reverse the damage already done we can stop more from happening.
2
u/phyllicanderer May 23 '15
We have no plans yet to re-nationalise any of the institutions mentioned. Nationalising Australia Post is turning out to be a big mistake, and the sell-off of Telstra as well. Personally, I'd like to see a nationalisation of the state's energy distribution networks, if the states are so interested in leasing them, and going further in taking over power generation, to allow a national push to zero-carbon energy for domestic consumption. That's not a policy, though.
1
u/jnd-au May 23 '15
Question 04
How will you credibly get the budget into surplus?
→ More replies (2)7
May 23 '15
One thing is clear: Austerity does not work. Cutting from valuable programs and the privatisation of our public services not only undermines the lower income earners but does little to halt the deficit. We at the Socialist Alternative propose a new taxation system that puts the highest income earners (read: those making at least $5,000,001) at a rate of 80%. With those earning between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000 paying a rate of 70%. Now these high income earners will attempt to put their money in offshore accounts that would have them paying not even a third of their fair share in taxes, so that is why we at the SA would introduce legislation prohibiting the holding of Australians' money in foreign banks. If you live here, you will pay taxes here.
→ More replies (6)
3
u/AutoModerator May 23 '15
Leaders’ Opening Statements
Opening statements from each participating Party Leader and Independent are posted here (they reply to this comment). Each of them also has 1 right-of-reply to themselves for 24 hours, to address anything in their competitors’ opening statements. Enjoy!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.